linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	mturquette@linaro.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	luca@coelho.fi,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:42:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131111194247.GB19212@saruman.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131110113716.GN26440@lukather>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2824 bytes --]

Hi,

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:37:16PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:00:48PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > From: Luciano Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
> > 
> > Add a flag that indicate whether the clock is a crystal or not.
> > 
> > Additionally, parse a new device tree binding in clk-fixed-rate to set
> > this flag.
> > 
> > If clock-xtal isn't set, the clock framework will assume clock to be
> > generated by an oscillator.  There's only one user for this binding
> > right now which is Texas Instruments' WiLink devices which need to know
> > details about the clock in order to initialize the underlying WiFi HW
> > correctly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Dropped CLK_IS_TYPE_DEFINED flag and just assume that if the flag
> > isn't there, default behavior will be taken.
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt | 1 +
> >  drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c                            | 6 +++++-
> >  include/linux/clk-provider.h                            | 1 +
> >  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
> > index 0b1fe78..3036dfe 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Required properties:
> >  Optional properties:
> >  - gpios : From common gpio binding; gpio connection to clock enable pin.
> >  - clock-output-names : From common clock binding.
> > +- clock-xtal: true when a clock is provided by a crystal
> >  
> >  Example:
> >  	clock {
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> > index 1ed591a..5db9bf0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> > @@ -91,13 +91,17 @@ void of_fixed_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> >  	struct clk *clk;
> >  	const char *clk_name = node->name;
> >  	u32 rate;
> > +	unsigned long flags = CLK_IS_ROOT;
> >  
> >  	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &rate))
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "clock-xtal"))
> > +		flags |= CLK_IS_TYPE_XTAL;
> > +
> 
> Introducing a new compatible instead of a property would make more
> sense here I think.
> 
> Do you have a reason not to do so?

As you can see, this is original work from Luca but I disagree that
adding a new compatible makes more sense. This still related to a fixed
rate clock, we're just giving it one extra metadata which will
differentiate between crystal and oscilator fixed rate clocks.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-11 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1382528150.21526.25.camel@porter.coelho.fi>
2013-11-08 18:00 ` [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks Felipe Balbi
2013-11-08 19:16   ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-10 11:37   ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-11 19:42     ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-11-11 19:50       ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-11 20:59         ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-12  8:05           ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-13 14:40             ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-11 20:54       ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-11 16:27   ` Stephen Warren
2013-11-11 19:43     ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131111194247.GB19212@saruman.home \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@coelho.fi \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).