Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deadlock in do_page_fault() on ARM (old kernel)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:15:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140120101509.GA2626@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D73220.3030108@signal11.us>

On Wed 15-01-14 20:13:04, Alan Ott wrote:
[...]
> 2. __copy_to_user_memcpy() takes a read lock (down_read()) on

This looks like a bug. copy_to_user_* shouldn't take mmap_sem at all
Check the might_fault annotation used in generic code. Arm version of
copy_to_user* doesn't seem to use the annotation and I do not see a good
reason for that.

> mm->mmap_sem. While that lock is held, __copy_to_user_memcpy() can
> generate a page fault, causing do_page_fault() to get called, which
> will also try to get a read lock (down_read()) on mm->mmap_sem.
> Multiple read locks can be taken on an rw_semaphore, but deadlock
> will occur if another thread tries to get a write lock
> (down_write()) in between. For example:
>     Task 1:         Task 2:
>     down_read(sem)
>                     down_write(sem)    <-- Goes to sleep
>     down_read(sem)                     <-- Goes to sleep
> 
> There is a thread from 2005[3] which seems to discuss the same
> concept of recursive rw_semaphores, but for futexes.
> 
> Other comments:
> 1. My analysis of this probably wrong. Otherwise it seems many
> others would have the same problem, and they don't seem to. I'm
> hoping this email will help to correct my understanding.
> 2. I looked through the git logs for recent (since 2.6.37 time
> frame) and nothing else jumped out at me as being an obvious fix for
> this situation.
> 
> Thanks for any insight you can give,
> 
> Alan.
> 
> [1] http://www.signal11.us/~alan/show-all-tasks-deadlock.txt
> 
> [2] Some websites/bugtrackers mention this commit with a similar
> issue, but I'm not entirely sure how it's related:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8878a539ff19a43cf3729e7562cd528f490246ae
> 
> This one seems obviously related, but has no effect on my system:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=435a7ef52db7d86e67a009b36cac1457f8972391
> 
> [3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/280900
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-20 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16  1:13 Deadlock in do_page_fault() on ARM (old kernel) Alan Ott
2014-01-17 13:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-18  0:57   ` Alan Ott
2014-01-18  1:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 23:50       ` Alan Ott
2014-01-20 10:15 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-01-20 18:45   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140120101509.GA2626@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=alan@signal11.us \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox