From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver: pwmss: Disable stop clk bit during enable clock call.
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140123141750.GB6503@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387366615-23182-4-git-send-email-sourav.poddar@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3244 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:06:55PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> Writing to ecap register on second insmod crashes with an external
> abort. This happens becuase the STOP_CLK bit remains set(from rmmod)
> during the second insmod thereby not allowing the clocks to get enabled.
>
> So, we disable STOP clock bit while doing a clock enable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c
> index 3b119bc..4749866 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ u16 pwmss_submodule_state_change(struct device *dev, int set)
>
> mutex_lock(&info->pwmss_lock);
> val = readw(info->mmio_base + PWMSS_CLKCONFIG);
> + if (set == PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN)
> + val &= ~PWMSS_ECAPCLK_STOP_REQ;
Should this be done for set == PWMSS_EPWMCLK_EN as well? Also how does
this behave if somebody goes and passes:
PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN | PWMSS_ECAPCLK_STOP_REQ
as the "set" parameter.
I think that perhaps the pwmss_submodule_state_change() API should be
rethought. Instead of taking a value that's directly written into the
register, perhaps it should abstract away what this does.
From my understanding this is used to enable (or disable) the clock for
a specific submodule (ECAP or EHRPWM). Perhaps an interface like the
following would be more intuitive:
bool pwmss_module_enable(struct device *dev, enum pwmss_module module)
{
struct pwmss_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
u16 value, mask, state, ack;
switch (module) {
case PWMSS_MODULE_ECAP:
mask = PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN | PWMSS_ECAPCLK_STOP_REQ;
state = PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN;
ack = PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN_ACK;
break;
case PWMSS_MODULE_EPWM:
mask = PWMSS_EPWMCLK_EN | PWMSS_EPWMCLK_STOP_REQ;
state = PWMSS_EPWMCLK_EN;
ack = PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN_ACK;
break;
default:
return false;
}
mutex_lock(&info->pwmss_lock);
value = readw(info->mmio + PWMSS_CLKCONFIG);
value &= ~mask;
value |= state;
writew(value, info->mmio + PWMSS_CLKCONFIG);
mutex_unlock(&info->pwmss_lock);
value = readw(info->mmio + PWMSS_CLKSTATUS);
return (value & ack) != 0;
}
void pwmss_module_disable(struct device *dev, enum pwmss_module module)
{
struct pwmss_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
u16 value, mask, state;
switch (module) {
case PWMSS_MODULE_ECAP:
mask = PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN | PWMSS_ECAPCLK_STOP_REQ;
state = PWMSS_ECAPCLK_STOP_REQ;
break;
case PWMSS_MODULE_EPWM:
mask = PWMSS_EPWMCLK_EN | PWMSS_EPWMCLK_STOP_REQ;
state = PWMSS_EPWMCLK_STOP_REQ;
break;
default:
return false;
}
mutex_lock(&info->pwmss_lock);
value = readw(info->mmio + PWMSS_CLKCONFIG);
value &= ~mask;
value |= state;
writew(value, info->mmio + PWMSS_CLKCONFIG);
mutex_unlock(&info->pwmss_lock);
}
One possible other interesting alternative would be to export this
functionality via the common clock framework, since you're essentially
exposing clk_enable() and clk_disable(). That's probably overkill,
though.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 11:36 [PATCH 0/3] pwm: ti: Miscellaneous Fixes and cleanup for pwm Sourav Poddar
2013-12-18 11:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] pwm: core: Rearrange pwm lock Sourav Poddar
2014-01-23 13:54 ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-18 11:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] driver: pwm: ti-ecap: Remove duplicate put_sync call Sourav Poddar
2014-01-23 14:19 ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-18 11:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] driver: pwmss: Disable stop clk bit during enable clock call Sourav Poddar
2014-01-23 14:17 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-01-08 6:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] pwm: ti: Miscellaneous Fixes and cleanup for pwm sourav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140123141750.GB6503@ulmo.nvidia.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).