From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: dts: dra7-evm: Make VDDA_1V8_PHY supply always on Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 01:44:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20140707084431.GK28884@atomide.com> References: <1404467748-12154-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1404467748-12154-2-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20140707082922.GI28884@atomide.com> <53BA5B8A.5010805@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:39378 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752215AbaGGIob (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 04:44:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53BA5B8A.5010805@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Roger Quadros Cc: kishon@ti.com, balbi@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, nm@ti.com, george.cherian@ti.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak , Tero Kristo * Roger Quadros [140707 01:36]: > Hi Tony, > > On 07/07/2014 11:29 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Roger Quadros [140704 02:57]: > >> After clarification from the hardware team it was found that > >> this 1.8V PHY supply can't be switched OFF when SoC is Active. > >> > >> Since the PHY IPs don't contain isolation logic built in the design to > >> allow the power rail to be switched off, there is a very high risk > >> of IP reliability and additional leakage paths which can result in > >> additional power consumption. > >> > >> The only scenario where this rail can be switched off is part of Power on > >> reset sequencing, but it needs to be kept always-on during operation. > >> > >> This patch is required for proper functionality of USB, SATA > >> and PCIe on DRA7-evm. > >> > >> CC: Rajendra Nayak > >> CC: Tero Kristo > >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros > > > > Best that you queue this with the series: > > This patch doesn't have any dependency with the others and we're not even sure if > this series will hit 3.16. > > But this 1V8 regulator _is_ required for normal operation of the SoC, whether the > PHYs are in use or not. > > Can you please queue just this patch for SoC fixes for 3.16? Thanks. OK will do. Regards, Tony