linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: "Gupta, Pekon" <pekon@ti.com>,
	"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"javier@dowhile0.org" <javier@dowhile0.org>,
	"ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com"
	<ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"jg1.han@samsung.com" <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] OMAP: GPMC: NAND: Introduce GPMC APIs for OMAP NAND
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:39:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140729103900.GL29045@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BFBB1F.9000901@ti.com>

* Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [140711 03:25]:
> On 07/11/2014 12:42 PM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> >
> > Therefore, I suggest you to move following code from NAND driver to
> > GPMC driver, nothing other than. And this exported function does not
> > need any NAND framework information, except number_of_sectors.
> 
> Well I you have still not pointed out what is the benefit of that approach or what are the problems with the approach I am suggesting.
> 
> I am suggesting that the API just return the ECC/BCH result registers as it is.
> You are suggesting that the API do the calculations and return the NAND ready ECC buffer.
> 
> To do the calculations it needs to know about the ECC scheme which is NAND controller specific and this is unnecessary in the GPMC driver.
> 
> Tony, what is your opinion?

As long as the GPMC registers are exposed to drivers in a controlled
way and we have only one driver using the ECC registers, I don't care.

Regards,

Tony

      reply	other threads:[~2014-07-29 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09 12:37 [RFC PATCH 00/10] OMAP: GPMC: NAND: Introduce GPMC APIs for OMAP NAND Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use a single hardware controller instance Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] mtd: nand: omap: Always use chip->ecc.steps for BCH sector count Roger Quadros
2014-07-11  7:43   ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11 10:35     ` Roger Quadros
2014-07-11 11:27       ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11 11:51         ` Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs to access NAND control registers Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use GPMC APIs for NAND control Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs for accessing Prefetch/Write-post engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use GPMC APIs for accessing Prefetch engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs for Configuring ECC Engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-11  7:54   ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs to get ECC/BCH results Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use GPMC APIs for accessing ECC/BCH engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-11  7:56   ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] OMAP: GPMC: NAND: Don't pass NAND/ECC/BCH register adresses to NAND driver Roger Quadros
2014-07-11  6:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] OMAP: GPMC: NAND: Introduce GPMC APIs for OMAP NAND Tony Lindgren
2014-07-11  7:27   ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11  8:28     ` Roger Quadros
2014-07-11  9:42       ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11 10:23         ` Roger Quadros
2014-07-29 10:39           ` Tony Lindgren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140729103900.GL29045@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=pekon@ti.com \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).