From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: nand: Force omap_elm to be built as a module if omap2_nand is a module Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:04:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20140922190407.GU1193@ld-irv-0074> References: <1410443224-18477-1-git-send-email-ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <1410443224-18477-4-git-send-email-ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <5412B66F.8050505@ti.com> <20140912165636.GA7276@arch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:47446 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750914AbaIVTEL (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:04:11 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g10so4493114pdj.33 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140912165636.GA7276@arch> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Roger Quadros , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, pekon On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Ultimately, I don't care much as I don't think anyone will build it as a module, > except maybe for testing the driver under probe/remove cycles. I see that you sort of answered one of my questions here. On what do you base this claim? I see maintstream distros are gaining support for some common ARM platforms, and I bet they ship loadable modules. Or are you seeing otherwise? Brian