From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: RCU bug with v3.17-rc3 ? Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:07:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20141009210715.GH25729@saruman> References: <20140904192535.GJ13421@saruman.home> <20140904200403.GL13421@saruman.home> <20140905213216.GD5001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141008171322.GH22688@saruman> <20141008175707.GI22688@saruman> <20141008212938.GP22688@saruman> <20141009160138.GA2396@cmpxchg.org> <20141009162656.GE16002@saruman> <20141009204101.GA25955@debian> <20141009204637.GE25729@saruman> Reply-To: balbi@ti.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5507607834493297389==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141009204637.GE25729@saruman> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Rik van Riel , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Tony Lindgren , Linux USB Mailing List , josh@joshtriplett.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rabin Vincent , Alan Stern , Johannes Weiner , Sasha Levin , Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , Linus Torvalds , Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --===============5507607834493297389== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6cMF9JLEeZkfJjkP" Content-Disposition: inline --6cMF9JLEeZkfJjkP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:46:37PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:41:01PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:26:56AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > alright, it's pretty deterministic however. Always on the same test, = no > > > matter which USB controller, no matter if backing store is RAM or MMC. > > >=20 > > > Those two undefined instructions on the disassembly caught my attenti= on, > > > perhaps I'm facing a GCC bug ? > >=20 > > The undefined instructions are just ARM's BUG() implementation. > >=20 > > But did you see the question I asked you yesterday in your other thread? > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg368634.html >=20 > hmm, completely missed that, sorry. I'm using 4.8.2, will try something > else. seems to be working fine now, thanks. I'll leave test running overnight just in case. thanks again, and sorry for the noise. PS: I wonder if we should a warning message to the build system if we're building with known broken versions of GCC. --=20 balbi --6cMF9JLEeZkfJjkP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUNvkDAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREEVsP/2SxJIVCFQ/Ulti5FMBUKRs/ MTOe7euqjdN8apn1xHhG/5TLuxLiV5t4rLCXBxEmmySxuN+0CzOWGYaoGWxr+2RT HucKWC1+alYTgV+W+uI2t+77ZAjjWe9+rkuWl3n+JP/eCZ/okFWS6vF+vG9k++Y2 tqluQNOA9tmZk0GiQ5a/tyF/27vfnVqSook+TPuV5UEYCghxyGHG/UWzKn3fUY0D e+n6Mqsq8E7R+ilnue9aJjTcWiAv14do1rDWNu+ZPl6Kx3u4jnW+Ok4IZE2xTdp3 OBLTK9weBNBJwqSp2m0zU8wXc2BEKBgMgQcAAfkbUxy/brI+gDnGtbUif5QsSy+t dDu3e68KflwJHqhwbzg67I7Z89KZASFbt4+gqq86dSZnV82Jn6lrvgiFB3vroDO7 AJMYRGmj6faT41doDkiyrqjxRVJmBjUspgBsQASMRyAWGtoKWfa5h5Bq6Au0M9Uf lUXcdz1pJsXldll/bpr0fwYAZZiah1arkVZ5uN1+KxoJRmrbnvdWN97BCK6Rm6i1 oBJjhysNEKOD/aY1FayFjwEUZ/jksujSqaR5YjT3ci21tYBUGrqe1DwGqyQLEg1R h+ZKElR6JcsBUYO8nK3Xm1zGQ3IkHkutGn/rLIwpC5ZpSEfe6O9vxch1dOwsH8Dq HGwP0I+2mUZfSlJHhqU0 =QSKq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6cMF9JLEeZkfJjkP-- --===============5507607834493297389== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============5507607834493297389==--