From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: pekon@pek-sem.com, javier@dowhile0.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Print error message in set_gpmc_timing_reg()
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:13:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029141323.GY2542@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5450AA4D.9040708@ti.com>
* Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [141029 01:51]:
> On 10/29/2014 12:23 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [141021 05:43]:
> >> Simplify set_gpmc_timing_reg() and always print error message
> >> if the requested timing cannot be achieved due to a too fast
> >> GPMC functional clock, irrespective if whether DEBUG is defined
> >> or not. This should help us debug timing configuration issues,
> >> which were otherwise simply not being displayed in the kernel log.
> >
> > I think some newer versions of GPMC have a divider in the
> > GPMC_CONFIG regs somewhere but we're not currently using it.
> > Probably does not affect this patch, just FYI.
>
> Right, we don't use it. In the future it could be a possibility that the GPMC
> driver scales the clock as necessary by using the GPMC_FCLK divider
> to accommodate slower devices. But then again, who needs slower devices? ;)
I think some devices need such slow timings that we're already
hitting the issue with 200MHz L3 on 37xx connected to a SMSC
LAN9220 at least. With LAN9221 this is not an issue with faster
timings. Anyways, I think the issue is out of the way now with
LAN9220 and GPMC_FCLK divider support can be added later on as
needed.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 12:41 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: configuration enhancements Roger Quadros
2014-10-21 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Print error message in set_gpmc_timing_reg() Roger Quadros
2014-10-28 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-10-29 8:50 ` Roger Quadros
2014-10-29 14:13 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2014-11-04 19:59 ` pekon
2014-10-21 12:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Error out if timings fail in gpmc_probe_generic_child() Roger Quadros
2014-11-04 0:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-04 1:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-04 9:03 ` Roger Quadros
2014-11-04 15:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-10-21 12:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Always enable A26-A11 for non NAND devices Roger Quadros
2014-10-21 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Keep Chip Select disabled while configuring it Roger Quadros
2014-10-21 12:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Sanity check GPMC fck on probe Roger Quadros
2014-10-30 15:10 ` [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: configuration enhancements Tony Lindgren
2014-10-30 15:24 ` Roger Quadros
2014-11-04 17:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-05 12:46 ` Roger Quadros
2014-11-05 16:09 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141029141323.GY2542@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=pekon@pek-sem.com \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).