Re: [PATCH v3 09/47] mfd: palmas: Register with kernel power-off handler

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > 
> > > Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> > > directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
> > > only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > > ---
> > > v3:
> > > - Replace poweroff in all newly introduced variables and in text
> > >   with power_off or power-off as appropriate
> > > - Replace POWEROFF_PRIORITY_xxx with POWER_OFF_PRIORITY_xxx
> > > v2:
> > > - Use define to specify poweroff handler priority
> > > - Use devm_register_power_off_handler
> > > - Use dev_warn instead of dev_err
> > > 
> > >  drivers/mfd/palmas.c       | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >  include/linux/mfd/palmas.h |  3 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> missed lakml and linux-omap.
> 
Felipe,

unfortunately, get_maintainer.pl doesn't give a hint that this and the
other affected patches should be sent to linux-omap. How am I supposed
to know ?

Note that linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org was copied on the entire series,
if that is what you mean with lakml. linux-pm@vger.kernel.org was also
copied on all patches. Additional mailing lists were only copied for
affected architectures to avoid for the patches to be tagged as spam.

If there is a list named lakml, I must have missed it, and I seem to be
unable to find a reference to it. If that is the case, my apologies,
and please provide a link to it.

Thanks,
Guenter