From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:16:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141207171646.GA12049@kahuna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417873576-10463-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On 13:46-20141206, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> After my series removing the gic_arch_extn hack, I figured that the
> next step was to expunge the GIC driver of the routable domain horror.
>
> There is a few reasons for this:
>
> - The allocation of interrupts in this domain is fairly similar to
> what we do for MSI (see the GICv2m driver), and stacked domains have
> proved to be a fitting solution.
>
> - The current description in DT is currently entierely inaccurate, and
> as we already broke it for the OMAP WUGEN block, we might as well do
> it again for the TI crossbar.
>
> - The way crossbar, WUGEN and GIC interract is quite complex (this is
> effectively a stack of three interrupt controllers with interesting
> exceptions and braindead routing), and stacked domains are the right
> abstraction for that.
>
> - Other platforms (Freescale Vybrid) are starting to come up with the
> same type of things, and it'd be good to avoid them following the
> same broken model.
>
> - It removes a few lines from the code base so it can't completely be
> a bad idea!
>
> So this patch series does exactly that: make the crossbar a stacked
> interrupt controller that only takes care of setting up the routing,
> fix the DTs to represent the actual HW, and remove a bit of the
> craziness from the GIC code.
>
> As for the previous series:
>
> - I haven't been able to test this at all, I don't have access to the
> HW. TI people, please test and post fixes, as I expect I introduced
> a few bugs.
>
> - This actively *breaks* existing setups. If you boot a new kernel
> with an old DT, interrupt routing *will* be broken. Old kernels on a
> new DT won't boot either! You've been warned. This really outline
> the necessity of actually describing the HW in device trees...
>
> As for the patches, they are on top of 3.18-rc7 + tip/irq/irqdomain-arm +
> the gic_arch_extn removal series.
>
> I've pushed the code to:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git irq/die-gic-arch-extn-die-die-die
>
> Comments welcome,
>
> M.
>
> Marc Zyngier (5):
> genirq: Add irqchip_set_wake_parent
> irqchip: crossbar: convert dra7 crossbar to stacked domains
> DT: update ti,irq-crossbar binding
> irqchip: GIC: get rid of routable domain
> DT: arm,gic: kill arm,routable-irqs
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 6 -
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt | 18 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 10 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72x.dtsi | 3 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra74x.dtsi | 5 +-
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 4 -
> drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c | 202 ++++++++++++---------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 59 +-----
> include/linux/irq.h | 1 +
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h | 6 -
> include/linux/irqchip/irq-crossbar.h | 11 --
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 16 ++
> 12 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/irqchip/irq-crossbar.h
>
> --
> 2.1.3
>
Patches are available here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5449231/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5449241/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5449271/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5449261/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5449251/
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-07 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1417873576-10463-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2014-12-07 17:16 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2014-12-07 18:03 ` [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain Nishanth Menon
2014-12-08 9:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-08 22:41 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-12-09 9:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-09 18:17 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-12-09 18:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-10 18:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-01-07 16:14 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-01-07 16:09 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141207171646.GA12049@kahuna \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).