From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Fixes for SDIO interrupts for dw_mmc Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 09:11:23 -0800 Message-ID: <20150102171123.GC3298@atomide.com> References: <1417563767-32181-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Ulf Hansson , Jaehoon Chung , Seungwon Jeon , Alim Akhtar , Sonny Rao , Andrew Bresticker , Heiko Stuebner , Russell King - ARM Linux , H Hartley Sweeten , Sascha Hauer , Wolfram Sang , linux-mmc , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Chris Ball , =?utf-8?B?R3LDqWdvcnkgU291dGFkw6k=?= , Joe Perches , Axel Lin , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Doug Anderson [150102 09:09]: > Ulf, > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >>> In v5, I don't find a patch 1/4. Anyway, I have taken patch 2->4. > >> > >> Ah, maybe because it wasn't sent to linux-mmc? I messed that up and > >> will try to do better in the future. Sorry. :( You were in the To > >> line, though. You can see at > >> . > >> > >> Do you want me to repost it and CC linux-mmc with Tony's Ack? > > > > I suggest you have a look at my next branch and to verify that I > > haven't screwed things up. If so, either I should drop the patches and > > you make a resend or if it's possible to just send an incremental path > > on top? > > The patches that landed look good to me, but I think you might break > omap3pandora's WiFi until you land patch #1 in the series. It has > Tony's Ack so I think he intends for you to land it in your tree. > > [v5,1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: Make sure pandora_wl1251_init_card() applies to SDIO only Yes please pick that one up too to avoid breakage. The changes to the mach-omap2/board-*.c files are only minimal fixes, so it should not conflict with anything I'll be applying. Regards, Tony