From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>
Cc: jdl@jdl.com, devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dtc: parser: Add label while overriding nodes
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:48:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150223014813.GB4536@voom.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424378462-22105-1-git-send-email-nikhil.nd@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1998 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:11:02AM +0530, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote:
> This patch changes the dtc grammar to allow following syntax
>
> i2cexp: &i2c2 {
> ...
> };
>
> Current device tree compiler allows to define multiple labels when defining
> the device node the first time. Typically device nodes are defined in
> DTSI files. Now these nodes can be overwritten for updating some of the
> properties. Typically, device nodes are overridden in DTS files.
>
> When working with adapter boards, most of the time adapter board can fit to
> multiple base boards. But depending on which base board it is connected to,
> the devices on the adapter board would be children of different devices.
>
> e.g. On dra7-evm.dts, i2c2 is exported for expansion connector whereas
> on dra72-evm.dts, i2c5 is exported for expansion connector.
> This causes a problem when writing a generic device tree file for
> the adapter board. Because, you cannot know whether all the devices on
> adapter board are present on i2c or i2c5.
>
> The problem can be solved by adding a common label (e.g. i2cexp) in both
> of the DTS files when overriding the device nodes for i2c2 or i2c5.
> This way, generic adapter board file would override the i2cexp. And
> depending on which base board you use the adapter board, all the devices
> are automatically added for correct device nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>
Applied, thanks.
I did tweak the testcase to use dtbs_unordered_equal instead of going
through the set of tree1 tests.
The fact that you can only apply a single label by this method is a
bit of a wart, but it's something we can fix later. I had a look at
it and (as I suspect you already discovered) it's surprisingly
complicated to do so.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-19 20:41 [PATCH v2] dtc: parser: Add label while overriding nodes Nikhil Devshatwar
2015-02-23 1:48 ` David Gibson [this message]
[not found] ` <20150223014813.GB4536-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-23 6:01 ` Devshatwar, Nikhil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150223014813.GB4536@voom.redhat.com \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdl@jdl.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.nd@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox