From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: simplify cover/card detect logic
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:31:08 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304163108.7b0902c8@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425385698-6588-1-git-send-email-afenkart@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1257 bytes --]
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:28:12 +0100 Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@gmail.com> wrote:
> These patches are trying to clean up the cover/card detect logic.
>
> Mobile phones (some) have no card detect pin, but
> can detect if the cover is removed. The purpose is the
> same; detect if card is being added/removed, but the
> details differ.
> When the cover is removed, it does not mean the card is
> gone. But it might, since it is accessible now. It's like
> a warning. All the driver does is to limit write access to
> the card, see protect_card flag. In contrast, card detect
> notifies us after the fact, e.g. card is gone, card is
> inserted.
>
> While cover detect is only used by one platform (rx51), it
> complicates the card detect logic. By separating the code
> paths they both become easier to understand and maintain
>
> Patches have been tested by reverting: 95bebb5696ab
> 'mmc: omap_hsmmc: use mmc_of_parse to parse common mmc configuration'
> otherwise gpio detection is handled by mmc_of_parse
Wouldn't it make more sense to put this core in mmc/core rather than in just
one host controller? That way it would be available to all hosts, and you
wouldn't need to revert that patch.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-03 12:28 [PATCH 0/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: simplify cover/card detect logic Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-03 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: remove unused fields from struct omap_hsmmc_host Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-03 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: use slot-gpio functions to manage read-only pin directly Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-03 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: use distinctive code paths for cover / card detect logic Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-03 12:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP2: HSMMC: platform_data: explicit gpio_cover / gpio_cd fields Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-03 12:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: simplify card/cover detect isr Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-30 9:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-03 12:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: use generic slot-gpio isr to manage card detect pin Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-30 9:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-04 5:31 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-03-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 0/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: simplify cover/card detect logic Andreas Fenkart
2015-03-05 13:43 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150304163108.7b0902c8@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=afenkart@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox