From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: am335x crypto module clocks
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 08:13:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150409151338.GQ18048@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAALWOA8Zno6pTfWRZpacgWm83m4=1+uvTmyREG9Nc+C2MZjK1w@mail.gmail.com>
* Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> [150404 21:26]:
> Hi all,
>
> To my surprise, the am335x clock tree (am33xx-clocks.dtsi) currently
> lists the functional clock of the AES accelerator and other crypto
> modules to be the (max 26 MHz) main osc. This struck me as rather
> unlikely, since the AES module is clocked much higher on other
> devices, and such a slow clock would condemn it to being slower than a
> software AES implementation. As usual the TRM is silent on the crypto
> accelerators and their clock management, but I did some preliminary
> tests.
>
> The AES module turned out far from slow. I actually had a lot of
> trouble keeping the module continuously fed with data with a simple
> non-dma test from userspace, since for most modes of operation the AES
> module could even keep pace with a tight loop using 128-bit neon
> load/store without even checking its status register for readiness.
>
> Although I haven't been able to get obtain a very reliable measurement
> yet as a result, it appears to be clocked at ~200 MHz. This also
> matches the fact that it is hooked up to the L3F (which would be
> rather pointless if it had a separate low-rate fck).
>
> It seems very likely to me the other crypto modules will also have a
> unified fck/ick (L3F for the hash accelerator, L4LS for the RNG and
> PKA). This should preferably still be double-checked of course.
Tero, got any ideas about this one?
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-05 4:17 am335x crypto module clocks Matthijs van Duin
2015-04-09 15:13 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-04-13 10:27 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-17 5:13 ` Matthijs van Duin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150409151338.GQ18048@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthijsvanduin@gmail.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).