From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2 Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 21:52:39 +0200 Message-ID: <201505152152.39471@pali> References: <1430769717-4088-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <20150506085204.GE30910@pali> <20150506144239.GH21061@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1563767.eJGD6N7Uev"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:36396 "EHLO mail-wg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934413AbbEOTwm (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 15:52:42 -0400 Received: by wgbhc8 with SMTP id hc8so91719718wgb.3 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 12:52:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150506144239.GH21061@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre , Russell King - ARM Linux --nextPart1563767.eJGD6N7Uev Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 06 May 2015 16:42:39 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [150506 01:53]: > > On Tuesday 05 May 2015 10:00:21 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [150505 09:41]: > > > > On Tuesday 05 May 2015 17:06:38 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > * Pali Roh=C3=A1r [150505 07:55]: > > > > > > On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > * Arnd Bergmann [150505 03:56]: > > > > > > > > On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > > > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, > > > > > > > > > we still have the following board-*.c files: > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > BOARD REASON NEEDED > > > > > > > > > board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test > > > > > > > > > system board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file > > > > > > > > > for v4.2 board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for > > > > > > > > > v4.1 board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags > > > > > > > > > support for user space > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, > > > > > > > > > then keep the platform data around for one more merge > > > > > > > > > window in case of reverting needed, then drop the > > > > > > > > > platform data too for v4.4 if no issues needing > > > > > > > > > reverting are found. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to > > > > > > > > do for the rx51 /proc/atags support? > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for > > > > > > > device tree based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. > > > > > > > Pali may have more info on that. > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the > > > > > > > revision are still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: > > > > > > > /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision": > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did > > > > > > not check if you merged them or not. I did not get any new > > > > > > comments for them for a while and right now I do not have > > > > > > time for looking at it again. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Oh OK, do you have link to the /proc/atags patch somewhere? > > > > >=20 > > > > > Maybe Arnd and Nico can pick them up and sort out how we > > > > > should queue them with Russell? > > > >=20 > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/648 > > >=20 > > > Hmm looks like you should resend all your pending four patches > > > properly with the people mentioned above in Cc to the LAKML > > > and linux-omap.. Assuming something will happen to them when > > > the patches are buried into a middle of some old threads does > > > not work well.. Best to just follow das protokoll und whine and > > > follow up until the patches get merged :) > > >=20 > > > Regards, > > >=20 > > > Tony > >=20 > > Now I resent "ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision" > > patches to MLs again without in-reply-to header. >=20 > OK thanks. >=20 > > Patches for /proc/atags I do not have currently in git format-patch > > mbox format, so cannot resent it right now... >=20 > Well presumably you'll resend those once you find them then :) >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Tony Now I sent them. Now you (or anybody else) can review all 4 patches :-) =2D-=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com --nextPart1563767.eJGD6N7Uev Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlVWTocACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1IYtACgo649lzd9UI034csz1es1PDXx 5yIAoIurJQE6vP6pQZiwjjTlHUPneg9Q =VgtV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1563767.eJGD6N7Uev--