From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 02/27] clk: ti: move generic OMAP DPLL implementation under drivers/clk Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:46:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20150520174648.GC10274@atomide.com> References: <1431334493-24455-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1431334493-24455-3-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <20150520012053.GC31054@codeaurora.org> <555CC7CA.2090104@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:52493 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753898AbbETRqw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 13:46:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <555CC7CA.2090104@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tero Kristo Cc: Stephen Boyd , mturquette@linaro.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Tero Kristo [150520 10:45]: > On 05/20/2015 04:20 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 05/11, Tero Kristo wrote: > >>With the legacy clock data now gone, we can start moving OMAP clock > >>type implementations under clock driver. Start this with moving the > >>generic OMAP DPLL clock type under TI clock driver. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo > >>--- > > > >How much of the code is the same from the original copy? Can you > >generate these patches with -M -C so that we can see? > > Looks like for the move patches the range is from 85%...95% exact copy. > Shall I repost the patches in this format? Good hint for the -M -C btw, I > wonder why those are not default options for git-format-patch. While tweaking your scripts.. Can you also check why the cover letter for your patches is missing the whole series diffstat? The diffstat is automatically created with: $ git format-patch --cover-letter -o /tmp/outgoing v4.1-rc1.. Regards, Tony