From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: linux 4.2-rc1 broken Nokia N900 Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:34:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20150721093441.GA23241@amd> References: <201507111405.06048@pali> <201507132234.22082@pali> <20150713215232.GA22584@deathray> <201507140002.44119@pali> <20150713223607.GA23001@deathray> <20150714071412.GA12844@pali> <20150720204647.GA11931@deathstar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150720204647.GA11931@deathstar> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Welling Cc: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Sebastian Reichel , Tony Lindgren , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Aaro Koskinen , Nishanth Menon , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon 2015-07-20 15:46:47, Michael Welling wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 09:14:12AM +0200, Pali Roh=E1r wrote: > > On Monday 13 July 2015 17:36:07 Michael Welling wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:02:44AM +0200, Pali Roh=E1r wrote: > > > > I think nothing special. I just call: > > > >=20 > > > > export ARCH=3Darm > > > > export CROSS_COMPILE=3Darm-linux-gnueabi- > > > > make rx51_defconfig > > > > rm -f arch/arm/boot/zImage > > > > make -j12 zImage modules omap3-n900.dtb CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MI= SMATCH=3Dy > > > > cat arch/arm/boot/zImage arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb > arc= h/arm/boot/zImage.new > > > > mv arch/arm/boot/zImage.new arch/arm/boot/zImage > > > > > > >=20 > > > Where are you getting rx51_defconfig from? > > >=20 > > > This does not appear to be in the kernel source any longer. > > >=20 > > > Can you try the above with omap2plus_defconfig? > > > =20 > >=20 > > It is in my linux-n900 repository: https://github.com/pali/linux-n9= 00 > > Repository contains more n900 specific patches but SPI code is unpa= tched > >=20 > > https://github.com/pali/linux-n900/blob/HEAD/arch/arm/configs/rx51_= defconfig > >=20 > > Later in week I can try to compile also with omap2plus_defconfig... > > But in my opinion kernel should not crash with different configurat= ion. >=20 > Has any progress been made on this? >=20 > Seeing as I was dropped into the middle of this thread, > I took a look at the discussion previous. >=20 > It appears that you are building the drivers as modules. > Perhaps I can again attempt to duplicate the issue using modules. > Though this should not make a difference. Actually.. for the record I'm _not_ using modules. So either I hit something different, or problem happens regardless of modules. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses= /blog.html