From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Hutchinson <b.hutchman@gmail.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: Fix FAPLL udelay in clk_enable with clk_prepare
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:38:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150923153812.GF23801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560242EB.5070001@ti.com>
* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [150922 23:17]:
> Tony,
>
> On 09/23/2015 12:23 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > As recently pointed out (again) by Thomas and Russell, we must not
> > wait in in clk_enable. The wait for PLL to lock needs to happen
> > in clk_prepare instead.
> >
> > It seems this is a common copy paste error with the PLL drivers,
> > and similar fixes should be applied to other PLL drivers after
> > testing.
>
> One thing to note:
> because of how the hwmod code works, at boot time we prepare all clocks for
> the devices and in runtime the hwmod only uses clk_enable/disable, it will
> never unprepare the clock(s). This will means that these clocks will be
> enabled all the time and will never turned off.
Good point, we need to check that for hwmod pm_runtime related
functions. Basically the PLLs we can't disable until in
pm_runtime_disable.
I think the approach we need to take to be that clk_enable/disable
is really optional clk_gate_enable/disable. And in many cases PLLs
don't have a gate, so it's correct for pm_runtime enable/disable
to not do anything for the PLLs.
And the reason we don't want to change pm_runtime hooks to use
clk_prepare_enable/disable is that then drivers can't use
pm_runtime_irq_safe like some do currently.
Regards,
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-23 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 21:23 [PATCH] clk: ti: Fix FAPLL udelay in clk_enable with clk_prepare Tony Lindgren
2015-09-22 21:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-23 6:12 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-23 15:38 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150923153812.GF23801@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=b.hutchman@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).