From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] irqchip: omap-intc: add support for spurious irq handling
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:28:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215152842.GR23396@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c78a6db02ac55f7af7371b417b6e414d2c3095b.1450188128.git.nsekhar@ti.com>
* Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> [151215 06:26]:
> Under some conditions, irq sorting procedure used
> by INTC can go wrong resulting in a spurious irq
> getting reported.
>
> If this condition is not handled, it results in
> endless stream of:
>
> unexpected IRQ trap at vector 00
>
> messages from ack_bad_irq()
>
> Handle the spurious interrupt condition in omap-intc
> driver to prevent this.
>
> Measurements using kernel function profiler on AM335x
> EVM running at 720MHz show that after this patch
> omap_intc_handle_irq() takes about 37.4us against
> 34us before this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Looks good to me, probably should get tagged Cc stable when
committing:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
> v3: add unlikely(), add profiling information
> to commit message.
>
> v2: increment error irq counter, use pr_err_once,
> add a comment on tips to debug spurious irq
> condition.
>
> This patch results in a checkpatch warning about
> extern definition of irq_err_count, but looks like
> thats the prevalent method of accessing that counter.
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> index 8587d0f8d8c0..f6cb1b8bb981 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> #define INTC_ILR0 0x0100
>
> #define ACTIVEIRQ_MASK 0x7f /* omap2/3 active interrupt bits */
> +#define SPURIOUSIRQ_MASK (0x1ffffff << 7)
> #define INTCPS_NR_ILR_REGS 128
> #define INTCPS_NR_MIR_REGS 4
>
> @@ -330,11 +331,35 @@ static int __init omap_init_irq(u32 base, struct device_node *node)
> static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> omap_intc_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + extern unsigned long irq_err_count;
> u32 irqnr;
>
> irqnr = intc_readl(INTC_SIR);
> +
> + /*
> + * A spurious IRQ can result if interrupt that triggered the
> + * sorting is no longer active during the sorting (10 INTC
> + * functional clock cycles after interrupt assertion). Or a
> + * change in interrupt mask affected the result during sorting
> + * time. There is no special handling required except ignoring
> + * the SIR register value just read and retrying.
> + * See section 6.2.5 of AM335x TRM Literature Number: SPRUH73K
> + *
> + * Many a times, a spurious interrupt situation has been fixed
> + * by adding a flush for the posted write acking the IRQ in
> + * the device driver. Typically, this is going be the device
> + * driver whose interrupt was handled just before the spurious
> + * IRQ occurred. Pay attention to those device drivers if you
> + * run into hitting the spurious IRQ condition below.
> + */
> + if (unlikely((irqnr & SPURIOUSIRQ_MASK) == SPURIOUSIRQ_MASK)) {
> + pr_err_once("%s: spurious irq!\n", __func__);
> + irq_err_count++;
> + omap_ack_irq(NULL);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> irqnr &= ACTIVEIRQ_MASK;
> - WARN_ONCE(!irqnr, "Spurious IRQ ?\n");
> handle_domain_irq(domain, irqnr, regs);
> }
>
> --
> 2.6.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 14:26 [PATCH v3] irqchip: omap-intc: add support for spurious irq handling Sekhar Nori
2015-12-15 15:28 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-01-04 8:35 ` Sekhar Nori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215152842.GR23396@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).