From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] clk: ti: am335x/am4372: Add tbclk to pwm node Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:46:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20160416004654.GP26353@codeaurora.org> References: <1457380318-15452-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <1457380318-15452-2-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1457380318-15452-2-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Franklin S Cooper Jr Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, t-kristo@ti.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 03/07, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: > Add tblck to the pwm nodes. This insures that the ehrpwm driver has access > to the time-based clk. > > Do not remove similar entries for ehrpwm node. Later patches will switch > from using ehrpwm node name to pwm. But to maintain ABI compatibility we > shouldn't remove the old entries. > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr > --- Acked-by: Stephen Boyd -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project