From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 00/15] clk: ti: add support for hwmod clocks Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:04:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20161220230455.GL4920@atomide.com> References: <20161028233750.GQ16026@codeaurora.org> <7371ef35-5d95-bf78-4c97-c61091a1fa4b@ti.com> <148156710975.37646.2957511113527634913@resonance> <20161213004914.GM5423@codeaurora.org> <20161213013133.GR4920@atomide.com> <148160402543.37646.6019420188689675769@resonance> <4b016883-e7c9-94d8-d964-3c8dfee6ee13@ti.com> <20161217014626.GX5423@codeaurora.org> <88baee5e-48c3-f0d3-de5e-8e578fab0aa4@ti.com> <20161220225627.GF5423@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161220225627.GF5423@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Tero Kristo , Michael Turquette , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Stephen Boyd [161220 14:56]: > On 12/19, Tero Kristo wrote: > > First thing to do here would be to implement the hwmod genpds, rest > > can follow later, but we need an agreement if this is the way we > > want to go. > > Ok. I guess we're just waiting on Tony then? Sounds right to me except for the hwmod genpd part.. We don't want to pile up any new code to mach-omap2 but instead we want to make the hwmod code into proper interconnect driver. As long as we do it that way, sounds good to me. Regards, Tony