Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] drivers: touchscreen: tsc2007 and ads7846/tsc2046 improvements (use common touchscreen bindings, pre-calibration, spi fix and provide iio raw values)

H. Nikolaus Schaller
2017-02-18T11:30:57Z

Hi Dmitry,

> Am 17.02.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:03:07PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>>> Am 12.02.2017 um 16:18 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns-xXXSsgcRVICgSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>:
>>>
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>
>>>> Am 28.01.2017 um 19:16 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns-xXXSsgcRVICgSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>> there have been no further comments/complaints about this patch series in the last month.
>>>> And it appears as if only your action is needed.
>>>>
>>>> What is missing for this patch series to be finally accepted?
>>>
>>> Did you find time to look into my comment on patch 1/9 and make a decision on patch 6/8?
>>>
>>> Is there anything open which prohibits inclusion to (and further testing within) linux/next?
>>
>> May I ask a question for my fundamental understanding of the Linux integration process.
>> Maybe, I have a wrong expectation which you can clarify.
>>
>> My question is how it does come that patches like
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=449aa83e69ff10d77fe088eadacafe1e97937c14
>>
>> appear within 2 days in linux-next, but our patch series had months of review (we are at v9)
>> and there have been no further comments from the community for weeks?
>
> Simpler patches are easy to apply, patches that have some contention
> tend to get unapplied longer, as they require more consideration.

Fine. Now I have better understanding.

>
>>
>> What is still missing what we can do or provide as information?
>
> I just replied to the other email from you.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus