From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] Motorola Droid 4: Add WL1285C support Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 17:19:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20170504001917.GM3780@atomide.com> References: <20170503142226.32380-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> <20170503160827.v5owcbiclea4f7kx@earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170503160827.v5owcbiclea4f7kx@earth> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Rob Herring , "David S. Miller" , Kalle Valo , "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , linux-wireless , linux-omap , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Sebastian Reichel [170503 09:11]: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:02:13PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > >> Motorola Droid 4 uses a WL1285C, as visible on iFixit [0]. This > > >> fixes the DT file to use correct compatible for the wifi node > > >> and adds the bluetooth node. > > >> > > >> [0] https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Motorola+Droid+4+Teardown/7759#s31961 > > >> > > >> Changes to PATCHv1: > > >> - use proper compatible value for bluetooth / shared transport > > >> - add patches fixing wlcore compatible for Droid 4 > > >> > > >> -- Sebastian > > >> > > >> Sebastian Reichel (4): > > >> wlcore: add wl1285 compatible > > >> ARM: dts: omap4-droid4: Use wl1285 for wifi compatible > > >> Bluetooth: hci_ll: Add compatible values for more WL chips > > >> ARM: dts: omap4-droid4: Add bluetooth > > > > > > For the series, > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > > > so now the question is if we merge this through a single > > maintainer or have each maintainer take the pieces? I would almost > > suggest that Dave Miller takes this directly into net-next to make > > this smoother. > > I think the only complex thing is, that patch 2 should only be > applied after patch 1. So maybe patch 1 could be applied via > wireless/net-next for 4.12 and the other ones go through the > individual subsystems for 4.13? Yeah removing dependencies where possible avoids pointless merge conflicts later on. Please send patches 1 and 2 together as a single patch to Dave Miller and describe why it's needed for v4.12. The rest can then get merged via the BT and DT trees. Regards, Tony