From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 00/14] omapdrm: DSI command mode panel support Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:01:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20171023220100.cso5sbxcx7itcj5r@earth> References: <20170724173311.27170-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> <20170929132649.63dy7mzjgknaevoa@earth> <20171013171207.GO4394@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pqmjrjnt6s4l2c6l" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171013171207.GO4394@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Tony Lindgren , Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --pqmjrjnt6s4l2c6l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:12:08AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tomi Valkeinen [171012 01:46]: > > On 29/09/17 16:26, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > Hi Tomi & Laurent, > > >=20 > > > ping? > >=20 > > I've been having quick glances at this every now and then, but I'm not > > sure what to do with the series. > >=20 > > We have one work item that more or less overrides everything but > > critical fixes: moving to common DRM encoder/panel drivers. Anything > > that makes that work more difficult should be postponed. > >=20 > > Especially patch 6 in this series most likely falls into that category, > > and might require a very different implementation with common DRM > > drivers. Also everything in panel-dsi-cm needs to be ported to a common > > DRM panel driver when can use them. > >=20 > > So my gut feeling is that it's best to keep this out for now, and rework > > it after Laurent gets the common DRM drivers working with omapdrm. >=20 > Laurent, got any other comments? >=20 > Maybe some of patches can be already applied to shrink down this > set a bit? I talked with Laurent at ELCE about this patchset and he is fine with this series going in before his work assuming its fine otherwise. He has not yet reviewed it, though and is busy the next two weeks. Regarding the panel-dsi-cm porting work: I will take care of this once the driver uses common DRM drivers. I don't expect major problems once omapdrm implements common drm's mipi_dsi_host. I do use the standard DT properties already. I do agree, that not applying this series makes Laurent's porting work easier, since he can rip out all of DSI. It's not used by anything except panel-dsi-cm, which is broken without this patchset. I don't think that's a fair thing to do, though. P.S.: I got asked by different people about the status of this patchset, which is required for display support on N9, N950 and Droid 4. It's not just me and Tony, that are interested in this :) -- Sebastian --pqmjrjnt6s4l2c6l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE72YNB0Y/i3JqeVQT2O7X88g7+poFAlnuZpkACgkQ2O7X88g7 +pqbNA//YbRMWW3RdN1T8ljs8z8ssRQ885hvU6j3ykUkcDL/CN3MwcoJnjQj4niq Y8QpZChQBvHxYGyVYzhg/hZcdaKLZoqQcskO7cKRjdeRLQuNzz5TLQ+/7x5ITFAr 8jWqYoFbemdhBNPYp8nkelYSjkpxN4hGLNABDTg9/UI2HaBJ8J0BnCOyLW4QIFAT ecpYVxNIDIG4n17yAx3u61hdetdpzHe7yNUIPRGIh3UfUG4dXQGNHoTfFPS7cObR eHhb9JcD0a3yO0ygNPYnBRt5IHg5PUkyMZF5/LZqb1bWf0HuFtMngqIQMnZ1NxCE 7bF5p4iBYUM0a8Og1PG5GsP8K8AQO4SrkJOey8G7h6IGBxzMTPaYNuWVKWMMl5C9 HoLOnW3619KOLiIcFuEI15/ZyS62F7ExNq7uAns9Z+63Or42AHucIiezjEZuIIoe O+XHuoPHQLgplaP3rGNrHzQvOGffylWLc/q/e0099O3XvFTLvEAE8Fe00ug/w2Gd J63zy4uuqzdv7XvJfz9LSoapXWYuDgiGe0OiNOqX6QfqwovqHgbsknkUpiM4hWAK v3peX5t9lDEyGNDB1WqRiJrKdHIDiKnkAN6SW0FbnrQx6XaVytCvlUWk0vENtmDy rasAbvVxJjA51iWymSdXS1dLME05B8DyQ/NykpXjhqPiv69cJJM= =nq+b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pqmjrjnt6s4l2c6l--