From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: PM regression in next
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:18:37 -0800
Message-ID: <20180111161837.f1c1d891a1b80d97e30a9b1b@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20180112000037.GA3875@atomide.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180112000037.GA3875@atomide.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:01:13 -0800 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'm seeing a considerable idle power consumption regression in
> Linux next, with power consumption for my idle test system going
> to 17.5mW compared to the usual 8mW on my test device.
> 
> Git bisect points to merge commit e130bc1d00a4 ("Merge branch
> 'akpm-current/current'") being the first bad commit.
> 
> I have also verified that commit 70286688e5ad ("ipc/mqueue.c:
> have RT tasks queue in by priority in wq_add()") is good, and
> commit e2d7fe89e8ae ("Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'init_task/init_task'") is good.

Do you mean that everything up to and including 70286688e5ad
("ipc/mqueue.c: have RT tasks queue in by priority in wq_add()") is
good?