From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Regulator regression in next-20180305 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:10:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20180307141027.GD7290@sirena.org.uk> References: <20180305231246.GB5799@atomide.com> <20180306163035.GE13586@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maciej Purski Cc: Fabio Estevam , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:57:12PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > I'm trying to figure out what is so special about these boards. The only > strange thing, that I haven't noticed at first, is that all regulators share > a common supply - dummy regulator. It is defined in anatop_regulator.c. No, that's a regulator framework thing - the regulator framework will use the dummy regulator as a supply when there's nothing described in the DT so long as the client doesn't explicitly tell it that the supply might be optional. --LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlqf8tIACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BGlgf+PRwjpmWYL9RWHYSFyl9NE+Av0pg57e5S2CUGYQpZw9iUEClJn7P5P9L3 FizLSWWRBCCmg0ZhS+qspwQyUCHnINNH9VO6vxSGVTBbsHGzQ0178uZPtLLGF0wR eCmyTOATh6O4sH+a+CXDRUy8uTej/7dE1NenQZBsDEODb5wVgD4fITny5xuoog0R 6TQK9lyiZSGiVD5SAC2x8fy8bElW2qDtDMYwiXbiNSI4iWzOCbwS+AFYEyUtMuxH 2zQ1OySkM4Bx7Zc81JKZX7f/R+UI2VzmXY1H1ZO0vgHkRVWqPely+3R3EO9NGYPv xkZZQi0+YN1sLzrkux2bhxBja7ZTIQ== =q7o/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa--