From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:37:14 -0700 Message-ID: <20180326153714.GG5700@atomide.com> References: <20180323181452.GJ5799@atomide.com> <20180323121530.f28dc29939d9395268911a4e@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?6ZmI5Y2O5omN?= Cc: Andrew Morton , Fabio Estevam , Stephen Rothwell , Rich Felker , Russell King , Yoshinori Sato , linux-kernel , Ralf Baechle , linux-omap , James Hogan , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * 陈华才 [180326 06:59]: > Hi, Tony and Fabio, > > Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken. Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross compiled omap2plus_defconfig kernel. I do have few more config options enabled like LOCKDEP and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, but I doubt they matter here :) Then I'm using gcc-7.3.0 and binutils-2.30 built with the buildall.git scripts: git://git.infradead.org/users/segher/buildall.git If you still need binaries, let me know. Do you know which arm devices are working with your patch? Regards, Tony