From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 15:30:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180509133014.GD14276@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509110024.1772-1-nsekhar@ti.com>
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:30:24PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop
> in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout
> error to be returned.
>
> Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of
> this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> ---
> v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew.
>
> The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has
> been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the
> non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to
> reproduce this.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
> index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/davinci_emac.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
> static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
> {
> struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs;
> - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT);
> + u32 val, ret;
>
> - while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) {
> - if (__raw_readl(®s->control) & CONTROL_IDLE)
> - return 0;
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(®s->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE,
> + 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
> + return ret;
> }
> - dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
Hi Sekhar
You could simplify this to:
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
> + return ret;
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-09 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-09 11:00 [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout Sekhar Nori
2018-05-09 13:30 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2018-05-09 15:46 ` Sekhar Nori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180509133014.GD14276@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox