From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OMAP4430 SDP with KS8851: very slow networking
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:14:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206221447.GM6707@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181206180806.GV6920@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> [181206 18:08]:
> reverted, the problem is still there. Revert:
>
> ec0daae685b2 ("gpio: omap: Add level wakeup handling for omap4 based SoCs")
>
> on top, and networking returns to normal. So it appears to be this
> last commit causing the issue.
>
> With that and b764a5863fd8 applied, it still misbehaves. Then, poking
> at the OMAP4_GPIO_IRQWAKEN0 register, changing it from 0 to 4 with
> devmem2 restores normal behaviour - ping times are normal and NFS is
> happy.
>
> # devmem2 0x48055044 w 4
OK thanks.
> Given that this GPIO device is not runtime suspended, and is
> permanently active (which is what I think we expect, given that it
> has an IRQ claimed against it) does the hardware still attempt to
> idle the GPIO block - if so, could that be why we need to program
> the wakeup register, so the GPIO block signals that it's active?
Yes we now idle non-irq GPIOs only from CPU_CLUSTER_PM_ENTER
as the selected cpuidle state triggers the domain transitions
with WFI. And that's why runtime_suspended_time does not increase
for a GPIO instance with IRQs.
I can reproduce the long ping latencies on duovero smsc connected
to gpio_44, I'll try to debug it more.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-06 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-06 13:22 OMAP4430 SDP with KS8851: very slow networking Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-06 16:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-06 18:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-06 22:14 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2018-12-07 18:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-07 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-07 19:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-07 19:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-07 20:55 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181206221447.GM6707@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).