From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Regression in next-20181211 with fsverity changes Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:59:00 -0800 Message-ID: <20181212145900.GD6707@atomide.com> References: <20181211191220.GW6707@atomide.com> <3171217.2PqYythArb@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3171217.2PqYythArb@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chandan Rajendra Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Stephen Rothwell , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Chandan Rajendra [181212 04:16]: > On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 12:42:20 AM IST Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 4de97efb578a ("fsverity: Move verity status check > > to fsverity_file_open") causes a boot regression for me with root > > on ext4 SDIO card, see below. > > > > fsverity_file_open() used to incorrectly return -EOPNOTSUPP for non-fsverity > files on kernels built without fsverity support. This bug has been fixed in > the V4 patchset . Yes thanks for the update. Regards, Tony