From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Update for dropped options Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 08:11:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20190205161153.GR5720@atomide.com> References: <20190204203747.7376-1-tony@atomide.com> <20190205105801.3eysznz63x3na4ui@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190205105801.3eysznz63x3na4ui@verge.net.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Geert Uytterhoeven , Russell King , Geert Uytterhoeven , Olof Johansson , "open list:TI ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER (CPSW)" , Linux ARM List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Simon Horman [190205 10:58]: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:07:38AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:37 PM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > These are automatically selected with make multi_v7_defconfig, > > > except for SH_DMAE which is selected only by sound/soc/sh/Kconfig. > > > > > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > Cc: Olof Johansson > > > Cc: Russell King > > > Cc: Simon Horman > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > > > > Thanks, this matches similar changes to shmobile_defconfig in commit > > 4162325afd0d553c ("ARM: shmobile: defconfig: Refresh for v5.0-rc1") > > in next. > > > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Acked-by: Simon Horman > > > > > I didn't update multi_v7_defconfig to avoid conflicts. > > IMHO the arm-soc maintainers should handle the refresh of the common > > config on a regular basis[*]. > > > > [*] When is the right time? I'd say it should be the last commit just > > before the release of rc1 (so all arm-soc submaintainers' trees will > > have the new base in their for-next branches for the next merge > > window), but that may be difficult to implement. > > > > What do you think? Thanks! Yeah I agree we should do it on regular basis just before -rc1 for multi_v7_defconfig. The reasoning being that make savedefconfig is pretty much useless otherwise for generating defconfig patches and the chances of pointless merge conflicts and errors keep increasing until something breaks :) I can attempt to do a late branch of the dropped and moved options refreshed against arm-soc defconfig branch if that helps. Regards, Tony