From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] mfd: demodularization of non-modular drivers Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:11:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20190307161140.GJ39872@atomide.com> References: <1547404609-14161-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20190116132431.GE23399@dell> <20190306231003.GD7915@amd> <20190307041808.GK26690@windriver.com> <20190307082524.GB4634@dell> <20190307083518.GA8052@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190307083518.GA8052@amd> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Lee Jones , Paul Gortmaker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Rubini , Arnd Bergmann , Charles Keepax , Cory Maccarrone , Davide Ciminaghi , Dong Aisheng , Graeme Gregory , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Haojian Zhuang , Jin Park , Jorge Eduardo Candelaria , Laxman Dewangan , Linus Walleij , Mark Brown , Mattias Nilsson , Michael List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Pavel Machek [190307 08:35]: > > > > Pavel, I hope this more extended explanation makes sense to you, and > > > that you simply have not seen me write these same details in the past. > > > > Blimey. That's a really long winded way of saying: > > > > "Modular-ness is actually broken in these drivers; [Paul]'s patches > > make that point clear for all to see. If people (authors/distros) > > wish them to be modular, they need to fix them properly." > > Has that been checked? > > I mean... when I saw the patch I thought "perhaps it should be doing > bool->tristate instead"? Thinking distors and loadable modules, for PMICs, only regulators need to be built-in in most cases. That's at least the case for example with drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c. I'd say applying these patches makes sense unless we have people step up and fix their drivers. Regards, Tony