From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] soc: ti: pm33xx: Push the am33xx_push_sram_idle to the top Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:34:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20190402173403.GQ49658@atomide.com> References: <20190402034253.4928-1-j-keerthy@ti.com> <20190402034253.4928-5-j-keerthy@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190402034253.4928-5-j-keerthy@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Keerthy Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, d-gerlach@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Keerthy [190402 03:43]: > Push the am33xx_push_sram_idle function to the top as a preparation > for rtc+ddr mode as the function will be called by multiple functions > currently present before it. How about say "Move the am33xx_push_sram_idle function to the top..." instead? And mention no functional changes assuming there aren't any. Regards, Tony