From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] bus: ti-sysc: Simplify cleanup upon failures in sysc_probe()
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 03:59:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190813105951.GN52127@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1a5c892-abc1-8978-67ee-92c4ecb3622a@ti.com>
* Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> [190627 15:24]:
> On 6/27/19 7:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> [190625 23:33]:
> >> The clocks are not yet parsed and prepared until after a successful
> >> sysc_get_clocks(), so there is no need to unprepare the clocks upon
> >> any failure of any of the prior functions in sysc_probe(). The current
> >> code path would have been a no-op because of the clock validity checks
> >> within sysc_unprepare(), but let's just simplify the cleanup path by
> >> returning the error directly.
> >>
> >> While at this, also fix the cleanup path for a sysc_init_resets()
> >> failure which is executed after the clocks are prepared.
> >
> > Sounds like this should get queued separately as a fix for v5.3-rc
> > cycle, probably got broken with the recent ti-sysc init order changes.
>
> Yeah, this patch does not depend on the previous 4 patches, so can be
> picked up independently for v5.3-rc as well.
OK applying the $subject patch into fixes, and the rest into
omap-for-v5.4/ti-sysc.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-13 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 23:33 [PATCH 0/5] Minor ti-sysc cleanups Suman Anna
2019-06-25 23:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add ti-sysc files under the OMAP2+ entry Suman Anna
2019-06-25 23:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: ti-sysc: Add SPDX license identifier Suman Anna
2019-06-25 23:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] bus: ti-sysc: Switch to " Suman Anna
2019-06-25 23:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] bus: ti-sysc: Add missing kerneldoc comments Suman Anna
2019-06-25 23:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] bus: ti-sysc: Simplify cleanup upon failures in sysc_probe() Suman Anna
2019-06-27 12:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-06-27 15:24 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-13 10:59 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2019-07-01 7:18 ` [PATCH 0/5] Minor ti-sysc cleanups Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190813105951.GN52127@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).