From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] bus/ti-pwmss: move TI PWMSS driver from PWM to bus subsystem Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 21:58:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20191017215751.7d05170c@archlinux> References: <20190901225827.12301-1-david@lechnology.com> <20190901225827.12301-2-david@lechnology.com> <20190902150245.GE1445@ulmo> <20190908121524.49b4874d@archlinux> <20190908194447.GM52127@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190908194447.GM52127@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Thierry Reding , David Lechner , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudA==?= Cousson , William Breathitt Gray , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:44:48 -0700 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Jonathan Cameron [190908 11:16]: > > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 17:02:45 +0200 > > Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 05:58:22PM -0500, David Lechner wrote: > > > > The TI PWMSS driver is a simple bus driver for providing power > > > > power management for the PWM peripherals on TI AM33xx SoCs, namely > > > > eCAP, eHRPWM and eQEP. The eQEP is a counter rather than a PWM, so > > > > it does not make sense to have the bus driver in the PWM subsystem > > > > since the PWMSS is not exclusive to PWM devices. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Lechner > > > > --- > > > > > > > > v3 changes: > > > > - none > > > > v2 changes: > > > > - new patch > > > > > > > > drivers/bus/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ > > > > drivers/bus/Makefile | 1 + > > > > drivers/{pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c => bus/ti-pwmss.c} | 0 > > > > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 --------- > > > > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 - > > > > 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > rename drivers/{pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c => bus/ti-pwmss.c} (100%) > > > > > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding > > > > Do we need an immutable branch for these precursor patches to the > > driver addition? It's not going to make 5.4 via my tree as cutting it > > too fine so we'll be in the position of holding these in a non obvious > > tree for a whole cycle. > > Sure an immutable branch would be nice in case of unlikely > dts file conflicts. And yeah no need to try to rush to v5.4. > > Regards, > > Tony immutable branch created based on 5.4-rc1 at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/log/?h=ib-ti-eqep-5.4-rc1 I'll pull it into IIO in a few minutes as have one more of these to do at the same time. Includes patches 1-4 of this series. Thanks, Jonathan