From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC24C43461 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C2D6100B for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352228AbhDNP1h (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:27:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46962 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352218AbhDNP1f (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:27:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A415C061574; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id t140so14633263pgb.13; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=iLYWJz3osXjxAkCOlH86kH9Vsgq0eoIxvXtUSYuGwMA=; b=H8c8MPpbxSfENIBBEJjGnJQDVz+drAfETl7C6XyziXHwjqr7OlzqUOu/o/1ZLHwDvv /N8/bnTNcMWJK/opajmZsxCr56ZR8eTQPcFXCrLhf++lx+prInij6KuIOR8LpyTpgcw8 R7GGuvMeWP9eoM3avQ5DSmbm9A/XVfsfTJQbXi/hwso3KOiJxYqvYBgWy3N40g+3X50X PNmDVbJgxjvZyd7Qs6gKOiAFOBmkoW1v6HJGozikxcaOBWBTHFPfHsf7ei8Ec0DZHO92 yJ8zjSCkNTl3Cf3DQPSXBz0YMZc2yObPdzzPD+HAnc1RSV6qAadiuyDxn0cNohORn9H7 HCmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=iLYWJz3osXjxAkCOlH86kH9Vsgq0eoIxvXtUSYuGwMA=; b=P/W2rariKaJIY09PavzNeZnvGOj4QiVL1RVRF9reHsWj+H1Ka8WqxpSfN7EAQP/4pA CJ8ZqGzocu4brJ2I8TBpd6jZH1ZC0Hemc9V+3IqI+IhXheDHa0dCPMKYZ0xmzDCnd/Ae dBMBrwZ6lX3NP1cyXZ84qGg0dx1l3nxTcLDEu5ueuGktuMZSPBWhNIVxldoM9Cf+jcv+ E3F2wth4cOi7TrBWvDlKHFJZEh8LQG1gbXx2qZPYiBXYfINSHYgmU4NAK/pX5hF1+Qk/ D22J1eb/tAJboSBUUMK7YjVPf3nDfvzBTJHKGqCrlm0v88lMI0ttFnAfaUOXWW3DORGt JRCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tb/O1G99qz8BEvIlOkkdMMb7wOSM9/T5lkBLpLUAwpaC5MIvz bqnasa4IqwBngz+xDX7vnmAbtiisPNSFyQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybmMtmhdU9JtYDDLh7Qv+Aqdv4vk1t72ErZeP7Gf8BlsXZlnwfdBLtFsFSxM6MGRgjqwgm3w== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4e47:: with SMTP id o7mr37462335pgl.286.1618414032749; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf (5-12-16-165.residential.rdsnet.ro. [5.12.16.165]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 25sm697832pgx.72.2021.04.14.08.27.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:26:57 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Nikolay Aleksandrov Cc: Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ioana Ciornei , Vadym Kochan , Taras Chornyi , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Grygorii Strashko , Ivan Vecera , Roopa Prabhu , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Vignesh Raghavendra , Linus Walleij , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tobias Waldekranz , Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: bridge: switchdev: refactor br_switchdev_fdb_notify Message-ID: <20210414152657.7ll7e2xh76njoc6l@skbuf> References: <20210414151540.1808871-1-olteanv@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 06:25:03PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > On 14/04/2021 18:15, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > From: Tobias Waldekranz > > > > Instead of having to add more and more arguments to > > br_switchdev_fdb_call_notifiers, get rid of it and build the info > > struct directly in br_switchdev_fdb_notify. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz > > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean > > --- > > net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 41 +++++++++++---------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > > > Hi, > Is there a PATCH 0/2 with overview and explanation of what's happening in this set ? > If there isn't one please add it and explain the motivation and the change. > > Thanks, > Nik Nope, there isn't. Being a 2-patch series, and having the explanation already provided in patch 2, I didn't consider a cover letter as necessary. Change #1 is just preliminary refactoring.