From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B91DC433ED for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1E061440 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234939AbhENPje (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 11:39:34 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:58884 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234934AbhENPjd (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 11:39:33 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14EFcBdW116931; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1621006691; bh=E/alwcgV9JJknmFSls3odmi4/ieZzTJaOoriooxhqbE=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=g9vJWTB8Oy1iuROhwCvLR+qkv4A2wMv6PcDpUYPpcfOna50HdPXZm0rYztJqyw3c8 WI3Mgw6Sp5w78EjOtB4NV6hU4d7QP1GAfTdfriOmfEwGMPVOjBc9ouL2x2rBvPU4mW d7TeyTvjURV3eJDvWlaqOwphzyH+z2mARkoL2QW0= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 14EFcBvl098869 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:11 -0500 Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:11 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14EFcAEc119567; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:10 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Luca Ceresoli CC: Grygorii Strashko , , "Bajjuri, Praneeth" , "Vutla, Lokesh" Subject: Re: Status of ti/ti-linux-5.10.y development Message-ID: <20210514153810.qv2kjdoy2ku2ss5d@unlearned> References: <78852763-4bc3-dc59-02c4-b3b07584c0ed@lucaceresoli.net> <56825232-0920-f2c6-b4c7-cb488465d870@ti.com> <9cb5a7d4-bf01-7079-8556-f6de008872c9@lucaceresoli.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9cb5a7d4-bf01-7079-8556-f6de008872c9@lucaceresoli.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Luca, On 12:20-20210514, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Hi Grygorii, > > On 14/05/21 12:14, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > > Hi > > > > On 14/05/2021 11:30, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I hope this is the proper place for this question. If it isn't: my > >> apologies, and I'd be glad to be redirected where appropriate. > >> > >> I currently have a prototype board based on AM5728 that is mostly > >> working, using branch ti/ti-linux-4.19.y of the TI kernel [0]. > >> > >> Now I need some non-TI-specific kernel features that appeared in > >> mainline 5.10, so I tried to move to branch ti/ti-linux-5.10.y. But many > >> components that I am using on the 4.19 branch seem absent on the 5.10 > >> branch, including VIDEO_TI_VIP, DRM_OMAP_WB and DRM_OMAP_CONNECTOR_HDMI. > >> > >> BTW they are not present even in mainline Linux. > >> > >> Are this drivers still absent and in progress of being added to > >> ti/ti-linux-5.10.y, or are they present in a different form that I have > >> been unable to find? > >> > >> Assuming they still have to be added, is there an estimate timing for > >> their availability on the 5.10 branch? > >> > >> [0] git://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel.git > >> > > > > > > TI 5.10 migration is still work in progress. > > Thanks for the feedback. > > Any estimate of how long this is expected to take? Nothing we will be able to share in a public forum :( > > Is there any public list of drivers to be added and their status? In public, No - Note: even though the git repo is public, and internally we attempt to follow the same upstream rules, at the end, it is still a vendor kernel :(. But, rest assure that internally, we know precisely where we are and we are tracking towards completion. While linux-omap is a public list, it might be better to answer vendor kernel questions in the context of e2e.ti.com (The TI forums - there are folks closely monitoring those and actively engaging to help customers out and will be better positioned to answer your specific queries). Do feel free to reach out to me on irc freenode.net #linux-omap etc if you'd need anything specific to help with. We usually prefer linux-omap mailing list to stick with upstream discussions, one off vendor kernel discussions do take place from time to time, however, most of our TI support folks are better equipped to answer questions on TI forums. The above "officialdom statement" said, we do actively encourage our community (which we include ourselves and TI customers as well) to participate in making upstream kernel complete and point out anything we may have overlooked (yep, we are human) so that overall what vendor kernel does or does'nt do should be inconsequential in the longer term for the community and products derived from community. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D