From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (EXT) Re: (EXT) Re: (EXT) Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:34:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401133409.wtilnpgp4fqlrrew@houat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2823402.e9J7NaK4W3@steina-w>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7198 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:07:10PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > Does it also happen if you only apply the patch I had above, and not all
> > the debugging?
>
> Yes, these are the last lines I see:
> ---
> [ 1.236306] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 DA6016 4.00 MiB, chardev (235:0)
> [ 1.241031] i2c i2c-1: IMX I2C adapter registered
> [ 1.251771] i2c i2c-3: IMX I2C adapter registered
> [ 1.256957] i2c i2c-5: IMX I2C adapter registered
Could you add on top of next (so dropping everything we did so far)
---- >8 -----
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 91f863b7a824..552b1e16a82d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ static bool mux_is_better_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned long now,
if (flags & CLK_MUX_ROUND_CLOSEST)
return abs(now - rate) < abs(best - rate);
+ pr_crit("%s +%d rate %lu now %lu best %lu\n", __func__, __LINE__, rate, now, best);
+
return now <= rate && now > best;
}
@@ -552,6 +554,12 @@ int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
unsigned long best = 0;
struct clk_rate_request parent_req = *req;
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: requested rate %lu\n", __func__, core->name, req->rate);
+
+ parent = core->parent;
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: current parent %s\n", __func__, core->name, parent ? parent->name : "(null)");
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: current parent rate %lu\n", __func__, core->name, clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent));
+
/* if NO_REPARENT flag set, pass through to current parent */
if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT) {
parent = core->parent;
@@ -578,24 +586,37 @@ int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
if (!parent)
continue;
+ pr_crit("%s: Trying parent %s (%lu)\n",
+ __func__,
+ parent->name,
+ clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent));
+
if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
parent_req = *req;
ret = __clk_determine_rate(parent->hw, &parent_req);
+ pr_crit("%s +%d %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret);
if (ret)
continue;
} else {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
parent_req.rate = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent);
}
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
if (mux_is_better_rate(req->rate, parent_req.rate,
best, flags)) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
best_parent = parent;
best = parent_req.rate;
}
}
- if (!best_parent)
+ if (!best_parent) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
out:
if (best_parent)
@@ -603,6 +624,11 @@ int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
req->best_parent_rate = best;
req->rate = best;
+ pr_crit("%s: Best parent %s (%lu)\n",
+ __func__,
+ best_parent->name,
+ best);
+
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_mux_determine_rate_flags);
@@ -1345,11 +1371,15 @@ static int clk_core_determine_round_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
+ pr_crit("%s +%d %s\n", __func__, __LINE__, core->name);
if (!core)
return 0;
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
req->rate = clamp(req->rate, req->min_rate, req->max_rate);
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
/*
* At this point, core protection will be disabled
* - if the provider is not protected at all
@@ -1357,10 +1387,13 @@ static int clk_core_determine_round_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
* over the provider
*/
if (clk_core_rate_is_protected(core)) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
req->rate = core->rate;
} else if (core->ops->determine_rate) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
return core->ops->determine_rate(core->hw, req);
} else if (core->ops->round_rate) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
rate = core->ops->round_rate(core->hw, req->rate,
&req->best_parent_rate);
if (rate < 0)
@@ -1368,6 +1401,7 @@ static int clk_core_determine_round_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
req->rate = rate;
} else {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1402,17 +1436,26 @@ static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
{
lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
if (!core) {
req->rate = 0;
return 0;
}
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
clk_core_init_rate_req(core, req);
- if (clk_core_can_round(core))
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
+ if (clk_core_can_round(core)) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
return clk_core_determine_round_nolock(core, req);
- else if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
+ } else if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
return clk_core_round_rate_nolock(core->parent, req);
+ }
req->rate = core->rate;
return 0;
@@ -2201,21 +2244,31 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
if (!core)
return 0;
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: rate %lu\n", __func__, core->name, req_rate);
+
rate = clk_core_req_round_rate_nolock(core, req_rate);
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: rounded rate %lu\n", __func__, core->name, req_rate);
+
/* bail early if nothing to do */
if (rate == clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core))
return 0;
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
/* fail on a direct rate set of a protected provider */
if (clk_core_rate_is_protected(core))
return -EBUSY;
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
/* calculate new rates and get the topmost changed clock */
top = clk_calc_new_rates(core, req_rate);
if (!top)
return -EINVAL;
+ pr_crit("%s +%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
ret = clk_pm_runtime_get(core);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2367,6 +2420,16 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk,
goto out;
}
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: orphan ? %c\n",
+ __func__,
+ clk->core->name,
+ clk->core->orphan ? 'y' : 'n');
+
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: core req rate %lu\n",
+ __func__,
+ clk->core->name,
+ clk->core->req_rate);
+
/*
* Since the boundaries have been changed, let's give the
* opportunity to the provider to adjust the clock rate based on
@@ -2384,7 +2447,11 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk,
* - the determine_rate() callback does not really check for
* this corner case when determining the rate
*/
+
rate = clamp(clk->core->req_rate, min, max);
+
+ pr_crit("%s: %s: clamped rate %lu\n", __func__, clk->core->name, rate);
+
ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate);
if (ret) {
/* rollback the changes */
@@ -2599,6 +2666,8 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
} else {
__clk_recalc_rates(core, POST_RATE_CHANGE);
__clk_recalc_accuracies(core);
+
+ core->req_rate = core->rate;
}
runtime_put:
---- >8 -----
Thanks!
Maxime
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220325161144.1901695-1-maxime@cerno.tech>
[not found] ` <20220325161144.1901695-4-maxime@cerno.tech>
[not found] ` <CGME20220330080612eucas1p195caaf35d900412de762a27ae02b7b9e@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
[not found] ` <366a0232-bb4a-c357-6aa8-636e398e05eb@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <20220330084710.3r6b5pjspz5hdmy6@houat>
2022-03-31 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put Tony Lindgren
2022-03-31 9:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-03-31 15:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-03-31 15:31 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-03-31 17:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-03-31 21:58 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-01 12:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-03 2:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-01 11:55 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-01 12:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-01 12:59 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-01 13:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-01 13:07 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-01 13:34 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-04-01 13:49 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-01 14:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-04 7:06 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-04 7:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-04 10:54 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-07 8:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-02 17:01 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-07 7:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-07 8:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-04-07 11:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-04-07 13:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 5:03 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220401133409.wtilnpgp4fqlrrew@houat \
--to=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox