From: Guo Mengqi <guomengqi3@huawei.com>
To: <tony@atomide.com>, <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <guomengqi3@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: single: Fix memleak in pcs_dt_node_to_map
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 16:17:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230703081716.15810-1-guomengqi3@huawei.com> (raw)
In a reliability test which repeatedly load and remove a module,
I found some kmalloc-256 memory leaks in pinctrl-single.
pcs_dt_node_to_map() will recognize a dt_node and
make a mapping for it. Along the way some pinctrl functions and groups
are registered in pinctrl-single controller. These functions/groups are
registered once and not removed during the system lifetime.
When the client module loads again, pcs_dt_node_to_map() fail to consider
this situation, create the same set of resources, and does not release or
use them.
To fix this, add a check at the start of pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry/
pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry. If the target is found,
then all the resource allocation and parsing work can be skipped,
just set the mapping with existing function/group information.
Fixes: 8b8b091bf07f ("pinctrl: Add one-register-per-pin type device tree
based pinctrl driver")
Signed-off-by: Guo Mengqi <guomengqi3@huawei.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 2 +-
drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 0dabbcf68b9f..3412e7f248d9 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -949,11 +949,14 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
if (!nconfs)
return -ENOTSUPP;
- func->conf = devm_kcalloc(pcs->dev,
+ if (!func->conf) {
+ func->conf = devm_kcalloc(pcs->dev,
nconfs, sizeof(struct pcs_conf_vals),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!func->conf)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!func->conf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
func->nconfs = nconfs;
conf = &(func->conf[0]);
m++;
@@ -1005,6 +1008,17 @@ static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
struct pcs_func_vals *vals;
int rows, *pins, found = 0, res = -ENOMEM, i, fsel, gsel;
struct pcs_function *function = NULL;
+ struct function_desc *desc;
+
+ mutex_lock(&pcs->mutex);
+ fsel = pinmux_func_name_to_selector(pcs->pctl, np->name);
+ if (fsel >= 0) {
+ desc = pinmux_generic_get_function(pcs->pctl, fsel);
+ WARN_ON(!desc);
+ function = desc->data;
+ goto set_map;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&pcs->mutex);
rows = pinctrl_count_index_with_args(np, name);
if (rows <= 0) {
@@ -1075,6 +1089,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
goto free_function;
}
+set_map:
(*map)->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
(*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
(*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
@@ -1132,6 +1147,12 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
+ mutex_lock(&pcs->mutex);
+ fsel = pinmux_func_name_to_selector(pcs->pctl, np->name);
+ if (fsel >= 0)
+ goto set_map;
+ mutex_unlock(&pcs->mutex);
+
npins_in_row = pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin;
vals = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev,
@@ -1223,6 +1244,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
if (res < 0)
goto free_function;
+set_map:
(*map)->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
(*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
(*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
index 82c750a31952..1d7b3df972b4 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ int pinmux_gpio_direction(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return ret;
}
-static int pinmux_func_name_to_selector(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+int pinmux_func_name_to_selector(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
const char *function)
{
const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops;
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h
index ea6f99c24aa5..3da8b38910b5 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ int pinmux_gpio_direction(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range,
unsigned pin, bool input);
+int pinmux_func_name_to_selector(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ const char *function);
int pinmux_map_to_setting(const struct pinctrl_map *map,
struct pinctrl_setting *setting);
void pinmux_free_setting(const struct pinctrl_setting *setting);
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-03 8:17 Guo Mengqi [this message]
2023-07-03 12:32 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: single: Fix memleak in pcs_dt_node_to_map kernel test robot
2023-07-03 14:59 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-04 9:18 ` Linus Walleij
2023-07-06 3:21 ` guomengqi (A)
2023-07-06 4:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-07-12 10:00 ` guomengqi (A)
2023-07-18 5:29 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230703081716.15810-1-guomengqi3@huawei.com \
--to=guomengqi3@huawei.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).