From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <bb@ti.com>,
<d-gole@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Introduce quirks to handle syscon fails appropriately
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 08:19:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828131915.3198081-1-nm@ti.com> (raw)
Commit b4bc9f9e27ed ("cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: add support for omap34xx
and omap36xx") introduced special handling for OMAP3 class devices
where syscon node may not be present. However, this also creates a bug
where the syscon node is present, however the offset used to read
is beyond the syscon defined range.
Fix this by providing a quirk option that is populated when such
special handling is required. This allows proper failure for all other
platforms when the syscon node and efuse offsets are mismatched.
Fixes: b4bc9f9e27ed ("cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: add support for omap34xx and omap36xx")
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
---
NOTE: this combined with https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828121008.3066002-1-nm@ti.com
has created a bunch of un-intended bugs on other TI SoCs such
as seen in https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826-opp-v3-1-0934f8309e13@ti.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240827131342.6wrielete3yeoinl@bryanbrattlof.com/
etc.
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
index 220fff7a302e..804329e81eb8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data {
unsigned long efuse_shift;
unsigned long rev_offset;
bool multi_regulator;
+/* Backward compatibility hack: Might have missing syscon */
+#define TI_QUIRK_SYSCON_MAY_BE_MISSING 0x1
+ u8 quirks;
};
struct ti_cpufreq_data {
@@ -254,6 +257,7 @@ static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data omap34xx_soc_data = {
.efuse_mask = BIT(3),
.rev_offset = OMAP3_CONTROL_IDCODE - OMAP3_SYSCON_BASE,
.multi_regulator = false,
+ .quirks = TI_QUIRK_SYSCON_MAY_BE_MISSING,
};
/*
@@ -281,6 +285,7 @@ static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data omap36xx_soc_data = {
.efuse_mask = BIT(9),
.rev_offset = OMAP3_CONTROL_IDCODE - OMAP3_SYSCON_BASE,
.multi_regulator = true,
+ .quirks = TI_QUIRK_SYSCON_MAY_BE_MISSING,
};
/*
@@ -295,6 +300,7 @@ static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am3517_soc_data = {
.efuse_mask = 0,
.rev_offset = OMAP3_CONTROL_IDCODE - OMAP3_SYSCON_BASE,
.multi_regulator = false,
+ .quirks = TI_QUIRK_SYSCON_MAY_BE_MISSING,
};
static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am625_soc_data = {
@@ -340,7 +346,7 @@ static int ti_cpufreq_get_efuse(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
ret = regmap_read(opp_data->syscon, opp_data->soc_data->efuse_offset,
&efuse);
- if (ret == -EIO) {
+ if (opp_data->soc_data->quirks & TI_QUIRK_SYSCON_MAY_BE_MISSING && ret == -EIO) {
/* not a syscon register! */
void __iomem *regs = ioremap(OMAP3_SYSCON_BASE +
opp_data->soc_data->efuse_offset, 4);
@@ -381,7 +387,7 @@ static int ti_cpufreq_get_rev(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
ret = regmap_read(opp_data->syscon, opp_data->soc_data->rev_offset,
&revision);
- if (ret == -EIO) {
+ if (opp_data->soc_data->quirks & TI_QUIRK_SYSCON_MAY_BE_MISSING && ret == -EIO) {
/* not a syscon register! */
void __iomem *regs = ioremap(OMAP3_SYSCON_BASE +
opp_data->soc_data->rev_offset, 4);
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 13:19 Nishanth Menon [this message]
2024-08-30 10:04 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Introduce quirks to handle syscon fails appropriately Dhruva Gole
2024-08-30 17:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2024-09-03 9:02 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240828131915.3198081-1-nm@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=bb@ti.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox