[PATCH v5 3/5] mfd: tps65219: Remove regmap_read check

[Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>]

The chipid macro/variable and regmap_read function call is not needed
because the TPS65219_REG_TI_DEV_ID register value is not a consistent value
across TPS65219 PMIC config versions. Reading from the DEV_ID register
without a consistent value to compare it to isn't useful. There isn't a
way to verify the match data ID is the same ID read from the DEV_ID device
register. 0xF0 isn't a DEV_ID value consistent across TPS65219 NVM
configurations.

For TPS65215, there is a consistent value in bits 5-0 of the DEV_ID
register. However, there are other error checks in place within probe()
that apply to both PMICs rather than keeping this isolated check for one
PMIC.

Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
index 081c5a30b04a..4aca922658e3 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
@@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip tps65219_irq_chip = {
 static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct tps65219 *tps;
-	unsigned int chipid;
 	bool pwr_button;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -246,12 +245,6 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = regmap_read(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_TI_DEV_ID, &chipid);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(tps->dev, "Failed to read device ID: %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
 	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(tps->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
 				   tps65219_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(tps65219_cells),
 				   NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(tps->irq_data));
-- 
2.43.0