From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, andreas@kemnade.info, khilman@baylibre.com,
rogerq@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 075/294] mfd: tps65219: Remove TPS65219_REG_TI_DEV_ID check
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 18:52:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250505225634.2688578-75-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505225634.2688578-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
[ Upstream commit 76b58d5111fdcffce615beb71520bc7a6f1742c9 ]
The chipid macro/variable and regmap_read function call is not needed
because the TPS65219_REG_TI_DEV_ID register value is not a consistent value
across TPS65219 PMIC config versions. Reading from the DEV_ID register
without a consistent value to compare it to isn't useful. There isn't a
way to verify the match data ID is the same ID read from the DEV_ID device
register. 0xF0 isn't a DEV_ID value consistent across TPS65219 NVM
configurations.
For TPS65215, there is a consistent value in bits 5-0 of the DEV_ID
register. However, there are other error checks in place within probe()
that apply to both PMICs rather than keeping this isolated check for one
PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250206173725.386720-4-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
index 0e0c42e4fdfc7..72a5f51fe32a5 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
@@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip tps65219_irq_chip = {
static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct tps65219 *tps;
- unsigned int chipid;
bool pwr_button;
int ret;
@@ -253,12 +252,6 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = regmap_read(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_TI_DEV_ID, &chipid);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(tps->dev, "Failed to read device ID: %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(tps->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
tps65219_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(tps65219_cells),
NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(tps->irq_data));
--
2.39.5
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250505225634.2688578-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-05-05 22:52 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-05-05 22:53 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 122/294] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw_new: populate netdev of_node Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250505225634.2688578-75-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=s-ramamoorthy@ti.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox