Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: omapfb: Fix __be32 sparse warning in panel_enabled()
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:05:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260822130523.116aa1bd@kemnade.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd542bf5-775e-407f-88cc-4cf18305f2b3@gmx.de>

On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 12:23:35 +0200
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> wrote:

> CC'ing the linux-omap mailing list, in the hope someone with omap
> knowledge can judge if the sashiko AI bot is right with his analysis that
> acx565akm_transfer() might be wrong on big-endian systems?
> 

well, it sits behind the spi interface, which should abstract hw oddities.
So wie should not ask about omap specific stuff.

BTW: same issue in drm variant of the driver.

> On 8/22/26 11:58, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > 
> > Pre-existing issues:
> > - [High] Hardcoded little-endian assumption when transmitting the command byte breaks the driver on big-endian architectures.
> > --
> > 
> > --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] fbdev: omapfb: Fix __be32 sparse warning in panel_enabled() ---
> > commit a9e06be56fc1b74d7c6e76133e9ea1c25675a615
> > Author: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> > Subject: fbdev: omapfb: Fix __be32 sparse warning in panel_enabled()
> > 
> > This commit resolves a sparse warning in panel_enabled() by explicitly
> > reading the display status into a __be32 variable. It then converts this
> > value to CPU endianness using __be32_to_cpu() before checking the bits.
> > 
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608211811.lps93xao-lkp@intel.com/
> >   
> >> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
> >> index 8f430d9e80549..0202ca8cbfc23 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
> >> @@ -210,12 +210,13 @@ static void set_display_state(struct panel_drv_data *ddata, int enabled)
> >>   
> >>   static int panel_enabled(struct panel_drv_data *ddata)
> >>   {
> >> +	__be32 disp_status_be;
> >>   	u32 disp_status;
> >>   	int enabled;
> >>   
> >>   	acx565akm_read(ddata, MIPID_CMD_READ_DISP_STATUS,
> >> -			(u8 *)&disp_status, 4);  
> > 
> > [Severity: High]
> > This is a pre-existing issue, but while looking at endianness fixes in this
> > file, does acx565akm_transfer() have a similar issue on big-endian
> > architectures?
> > 
> > When acx565akm_read() calls acx565akm_transfer(), it passes the command as
> > an int:
> > 
> > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c:acx565akm_transfer() {
> >      ...
> >      cmd &=  0xff;
> >      x->tx_buf = &cmd;
> >      x->bits_per_word = 9;
> >      x->len = 2;
> >      ...
> > }
> > 
> > Because bits_per_word > 8, the SPI controller reads the buffer as a 16-bit
> > integer. Taking the address of a 32-bit int on a little-endian system yields
> > the command byte in the lowest bits. However, on big-endian systems, &cmd
> > points to the most significant bytes (which are 0x00).
> > 
> > Will the SPI controller end up transmitting 0x0000 instead of the requested
> > command on big-endian architectures?
> > 
Probably yes, at least if I do not see uint32 * as a pointer in the tx_buf there.
The more interesting thing would be the 9th bit. There would be some requirement
neded and documented in the spi_transfer struct to put things into 32bit words
if bits per word is > 8. Nobody would forbid using u16.

Regards,
Andreas
 

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-22 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260822094805.421002-1-deller@gmx.de>
     [not found] ` <20260822095809.1D0651F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-08-22 10:23   ` [PATCH] fbdev: omapfb: Fix __be32 sparse warning in panel_enabled() Helge Deller
2026-08-22 11:05     ` Andreas Kemnade [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260822130523.116aa1bd@kemnade.info \
    --to=andreas@kemnade.info \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox