From: "Ивайло Димитров" <freemangordon@abv.bg>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, tony@atomide.com, nm@ti.com,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi,
pdeschrijver@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 21:36:40 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2121638991.49538.1376246200421.JavaMail.apache@mail81.abv.bg> (raw)
>-------- Оригинално писмо --------
>От: Dave Martin
>Относно: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which
calling instruction smc #1
>До: Pali Rohár
>Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2013, Август 5 16:29:44 EEST
>
>
>On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 10:45:00AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> Here is new version (v3) of omap secure part patch:
>>
>> Other secure functions omap_smc1() and omap_smc2() calling instruction smc #0
>> but Nokia RX-51 board needs to call smc #1 for PPA access.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
>> index 0e72917..c4586f4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>> extern u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
>> u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 arg3, u32 arg4);
>> extern u32 omap_smc2(u32 id, u32 falg, u32 pargs);
>> +extern u32 omap_smc3(u32 id, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 pargs);
>> extern phys_addr_t omap_secure_ram_mempool_base(void);
>> extern int omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock(void);
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
>> index f6441c1..7bbc043 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
>> @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
>> /*
>> - * OMAP44xx secure APIs file.
>> + * OMAP34xx and OMAP44xx secure APIs file.
>> *
>> * Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments, Inc.
>> * Written by Santosh Shilimkar
>> *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Ivaylo Dimitrov
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Pali Rohár
>> *
>> * This program is free software,you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> @@ -54,6 +56,23 @@ ENTRY(omap_smc2)
>> ldmfd sp!, {r4-r12, pc}
>> ENDPROC(omap_smc2)
>>
>> +/**
>> + * u32 omap_smc3(u32 service_id, u32 process_id, u32 flag, u32 pargs)
>> + * Low level common routine for secure HAL and PPA APIs via smc #1
>> + * r0 - @service_id: Secure Service ID
>> + * r1 - @process_id: Process ID
>> + * r2 - @flag: Flag to indicate the criticality of operation
>> + * r3 - @pargs: Physical address of parameter list
>> + */
>> +ENTRY(omap_smc3)
>> + stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr}
>> + mov r12, r0 @ Copy the secure service ID
>> + mov r6, #0xff @ Indicate new Task call
>> + dsb @ Memory Barrier
>
>Can you explain _why_ the barrier is there? The reader doesn't need to
>be told that a barrier instruction is a barrier instruction.
>
>Cheers
>---Dave
>
Hi Dave,
Would quoting Santosh's explanation "DSBs were needed on OMAP for power sequencing." do the job?
Something like "@ Needed on OMAP for power sequencing" instead of "@ Memory Barrier".
I want to be sure I correctly understand your requirement.
Regards,
Ivo
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-11 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-11 18:36 Ивайло Димитров [this message]
2013-09-04 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1 Pali Rohár
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-04 12:43 Dave Martin
2013-07-11 19:43 [PATCH v2 " Ивайло Димитров
2013-07-11 19:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-12 10:24 ` Dave Martin
2013-08-04 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 " Pali Rohár
2013-08-05 13:29 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2121638991.49538.1376246200421.JavaMail.apache@mail81.abv.bg \
--to=freemangordon@abv.bg \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).