From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sricharan R Subject: RE: [PATCH] omap2+: mux: Initialise the static pads. Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:09:34 +0530 Message-ID: <2782019daf925e90676e1d40323b747e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1299003360-32120-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com> <20110304022832.GR20560@atomide.com> <44e29d555f2b399b7067d827603897cc@mail.gmail.com> <20110304162858.GW20560@atomide.com> <4ad439dff008aeca2a058207ef744650@mail.gmail.com> <20110304174301.GA20560@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.77]:57161 "EHLO na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754920Ab1CGEjh (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2011 23:39:37 -0500 Received: by mail-vx0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 38so3237719vxc.10 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 20:39:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110304174301.GA20560@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Benoit Cousson , paul@pswan.com, Santosh Shilimkar Hi Tony, >-----Original Message----- >From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@atomide.com] >Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:13 PM >To: Sricharan R >Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Benoit Cousson; paul@pswan.com; Santosh >Shilimkar >Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap2+: mux: Initialise the static pads. > >* Sricharan R [110304 09:31]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> >Hmm it's there as commit 93c5f165e10c21a3813a687204388a34072b2a62 >> >> >in devel-mux branch. Can you please update your patch against >> >> >that commit so it's easier to see what your changes are? >> >> > >> >> >BTW, the patch you posted got trashed by your email client >> >> >or server.. >> >> > >> >> Here is the updated patch on top of your previous patch. > >The patch formatting is still trashed, notice the double line >spacing.. > Very sorry about this. Below is the link for the patch. http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129947252016935&w=2 >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c >> >> @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, >u8 >> state) > >..and the line wrapping of the patch lines. > >> >> + if ((state == _HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED) && hmux->pads_dynamic >> >> + && hmux->enabled) { > >Yes I see that might allow removing the idle flag. Will give it >a try with my testcase once you get your mail issue sorted out >and can post a patch that applies. > Ok. I have checked this applies on top of the devel-mux branch. >Tony > Thanks, Sricharan