From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Kochetkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: omap: fix "Too much work in one IRQ" irq handling Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:38:28 +0300 Message-ID: <2DED62C3-7C54-49E0-A39B-F68D5DAC66B1@gmail.com> References: <1416014452-6712-1-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <1416014452-6712-2-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <20141115014859.GC808@saruman> <7C4EE58D-8956-40C2-B649-775B2F551D2A@gmail.com> <20141115034756.GA2917@saruman> <20141115035328.GA3289@saruman> <20141116154558.GA7422@saruman> <20141117144152.GA12644@katana> <20141118160059.GI8223@saruman> <20141118161241.GH30004@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141118161241.GH30004@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Alexander Kochetkov , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Felipe Balbi List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hello,=20 18 =CE=CF=D1=C2. 2014 =C7., =D7 19:12, Wolfram Sang = =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC(=C1): > I got confused with all the patches sent out for his issues. Can you = ack > them once you are fine and mention if you consider them important for > this or the next release? That would be really helpful! Duplicate/Obsolete (v1): https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411059/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411060/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411081/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411084/ v2 (in review by Aaro) https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411714/ comment to v2: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411740/ latest, v3 (same as v2, fixed subject line): https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/412095/ So, for now only one (v2 or v3) patch should be accepted or declined. All others should be dropped and forgotten. Sorry, for making so much noise. Alexander.