From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] omap2plus: voltage: Trivial warning fix 'no return statement' Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 00:16:30 +0530 Message-ID: <355afda07dcc328c046ca30fcd248355@mail.gmail.com> References: <1294165576-15628-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1294165576-15628-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1294165576-15628-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1294165576-15628-4-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <4D236A5D.9040803@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.71]:41686 "EHLO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751104Ab1ADSqc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:46:32 -0500 Received: by mail-yx0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 34so7727962yxm.22 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:46:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D236A5D.9040803@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , tony@atomide.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thara Gopinath , Kevin Hilman > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Nishanth Menon > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 12:14 AM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; khilman@ti.com; tony@atomide.com; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thara Gopinath; Kevin Hilman > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] omap2plus: voltage: Trivial warning fix 'no > return statement' > > Santosh Shilimkar had written, on 01/04/2011 12:26 PM, the > following: > [..] > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h > b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h > > index 0ff1233..710f4ea 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h > > @@ -134,7 +134,10 @@ void omap_change_voltscale_method(struct > voltagedomain *voltdm, > > int omap_voltage_late_init(void); > > #else > > static inline int omap_voltage_register_pmic(struct voltagedomain > *voltdm, > > - struct omap_volt_pmic_info *pmic_info) {} > > + struct omap_volt_pmic_info *pmic_info) > > +{ > > + return 0; > since we dont really succeed registering the pmic to voltage layer, > return -EINVAL? > Ok. Will take this in v2 Regards, Santosh