From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anand Gadiyar Subject: RE: Dropping omap3430 ES1.0 support in mainline Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 03:44:05 +0530 Message-ID: <3700cfbb0159d56cecbda0e06a2957e3@mail.gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.67]:47536 "HELO na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753197Ab0JAWOG (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:14:06 -0400 Received: by mail-ww0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 18so453812wwi.5 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:14:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Anand Gadiyar wrote: > > > The OMAP3430 ES1.0 was pretty much a test chip, with the only known board > > being the 3430ES1.0 SDP. There are only a small number of these boards > > outside TI and within TI, they've likely never been used in over 2 years. > > It's unlikely that these boards still work on mainline, and likely have > > been broken in linux-omap since the very beginning. > > We had linux-omap booting on the 3430SDP ES1.0 from at least 2007: > > http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/linux-omap-open-source/2007-November/01216 0.html > > We've used the 3430SDP ES1.0 as part of our regular testbed up until last > year, when it fried itself, so as far as I know, it's worked the whole > time. > Okay, so we're aligned that you guys don't have an ES1 board to test, and TI doesn't have any either. :) I'd still like to know if anyone in the wild still cares about the board. (I see Tony already said "No thanks", but I'd like to know anyway). - Anand