From: "xuxian" <lsfdxuxian@gmail.com>
To: 'Matthew Percival' <matthew@capgo.com>,
'Linux OMAP Open Source' <linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com>
Subject: RE: problems on building root filesystem using scratchbox and meamo
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:54:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4398f1fe.19db014d.48d8.ffffdf58@mx.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1133993121.8897.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
What part decides the size of erase block? The hardware, the kernel or the
root filesystem?
Best regards,
xuxian
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com
[mailto:linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com] On Behalf Of Matthew
Percival
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:05 AM
To: Linux OMAP Open Source
Subject: RE: problems on building root filesystem using scratchbox and meamo
G'Day,
> I use the command:
> mkfs.jffs2 -p -l -e 0x20000 -n -v -r /home/xuxian/rootfs/fs -o
> filesys.jffs2
> to make the root filesystem image.
For my OSK, -e 0x20000 is the correct size; the command I use is
basically the same as you.
> What size of the erase block will be fine? I can't access the file
/proc/mtd
> because I cannot mount the filesystem. Does the kernel determine the size
of
> erase block or anything else? Where can I set the erase block size?
If you mount your filesystem as an NFS root rather than an image,
then
you can read /proc/mtd, but I would say you are most likely correct in
your erase size.
I am not familiar with scratchbox or maemo, so it is possible your
problem relates to them, but I cannot be sure. Sorry, I probably will
not be of much help here.
-- Matthew
_______________________________________________
Linux-omap-open-source mailing list
Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com
http://linux.omap.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-omap-open-source
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-09 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-05 13:37 problems on building root filesystem using scratchbox and meamo xuxian
2005-12-05 22:11 ` Matthew Percival
2005-12-07 6:14 ` xuxian
2005-12-07 22:05 ` Matthew Percival
2005-12-09 2:54 ` xuxian [this message]
2005-12-09 3:45 ` Menon, Nishanth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4398f1fe.19db014d.48d8.ffffdf58@mx.gmail.com \
--to=lsfdxuxian@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com \
--cc=matthew@capgo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox