From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Cohen Subject: Re: omap24xxcam status (Was: v4l2 camera test app) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:36:12 -0400 Message-ID: <441EE80C.6000503@indt.org.br> References: <304D2A85A9643F4A991BDDF8D297BBA602A10CB5@dlee05.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <304D2A85A9643F4A991BDDF8D297BBA602A10CB5@dlee05.ent.ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: "ext Zhang, Jian" Cc: Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Yes... good point. I will genereted another patch with support to this new interface. But it would be great if anyone could test this patch on H4. Regards, David Cohen ext Zhang, Jian wrote: >David, > >I don't see the new sensor interface incorporated in your patch. It is >likely that Micron 2MP camera MT9D111 will be used by more people. The >new sensor interface supports double-context which is an advanced >feature of micron camera. > >Regards, >Jian > >-----Original Message----- >From: David Cohen [mailto:david.cohen@indt.org.br] >Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 10:10 AM >To: ext Komal Shah >Cc: Ola Helm; Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com; Zhang, Jian >Subject: Re: omap24xxcam status (Was: v4l2 camera test app) > >Hi, > >I just sent a code that should be compilable and working. I guess the >mainly target is to apply this patch to the public tree. After that, as >Komal said, could be interesting to update the dma code to the omap api >to be easier future reviews. > >Regards, > >David Cohen > >ext Komal Shah wrote: > > > >>--- Ola Helm wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Have you got some idea what's the situation of the 24xx camera driver >>>at the >>>moment? AFAIK the patch David sent in last month is not included to >>>tree, >>>propably since there were some opposite opinions about the way of >>>implementation and at least I did not have one file mentioned in >>>patch (I >>>think you mentioned about the same issue) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>24xx camera driver is now in David's hand. I just review the code now, >>as not able to work on camera stuff anymore. >> >>Following strategy can work out meanwhile as I had offline discussion >>with David :) >> >>o Separate 24xx CamDMA code from omap24xxcam.c to new file as >> exported apis (Suggested by David) >> >>o Keep the old omap24xxcam driver interface(2.6.8 TI kernel days), >> having video out code part of the camera driver itself. As new >> separated video out code depends upon the common display controller >> library, which requires to change fb driver in git tree to adopt >> that interface, so that video out, and fb driver can >> utilize the same code. But video out patches submitted by me didn't >> generated any discussion on the list in that direction. >> >>o So, to have 24xx camera code in git tree, we can use the old camera >> driver interface as of now, if everyone agrees. >> >>---Komal Shah >>http://komalshah.blogspot.com/ >> >>__________________________________________________ >>Do You Yahoo!? >>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> >> > > >